the bayesian interpretation of probability is so based
#7
(09-05-2022, 01:54 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 01:23 AM)used condom Wrote:
(08-05-2022, 04:44 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(08-05-2022, 04:38 PM)used condom Wrote: theology and science are as interchangeable as time* and space (observed through the prism of special relativity)

* speed is just a subset of time, and mass of space

who would you trust more: a scientist or a theologian?

in this era, a scientist, clearly

i see you are still struggling to grasp my view on this topic. happens to brainwashed dogmatists
I understand it but I think it's stupid 

there was sufficient advancement in human knowledge and change in approach during scientific revolution that separation is justified

there is nothing unique in that separation, us perceiving it that way is just its operative function

nor is it a once in eternity phenomenon

so obv you arent quite there
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: the bayesian interpretation of probability is so based - by Altruist - 09-05-2022, 02:03 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)