i'm one of the most masculine users here

[slop slinger]

i had a brief undisputed style posting era on lookism, i can speak that language but here's why I don't like it:

yeah, when people went at each other in undisputed style à la noonz's reply above, you weren't really seeing, say, a battle happening between two distinct personalities, you were basically seeing patriarchal deepstate background noise momentarily coalescing in the form of forum posts, turning from gaseous into solid form in the form of insults, gifs, and images that communicated nothing but the affect of "Confrontation." It's not even hypermasculine. Its just not human at all. you didn't even get the sense that there were two people fighting about something. its just hormones hooking up to the digital realm unmediated by consciousness, detached from and without any consideration for the human bodies those hormones are attached to. i got the same vibe, for example, from forevergymcelling's persona in general. You need different kinds of encounters, conflicts, and forced forum dramas in order to be able to detect the presence of another consciousness and smell your interlocutor's greasy dorito stained fingers through the screen. if you can't smell their fingers then i'm like, i don't see the point. You can't detect any human emotion otherwise. It doesn't tickle my brain to  interact with users posting like that. They're  like watching commercials during Twin Peaks.

noonz's reply would be more effective if he had an aura with more character depth on the forum. undisputed style posting is only interesting if they subtly, coquettishly convey some bizarre personality trait and I haven't seen anything of the sort from him over the years. As it stands, the best I can do is semi ironically repost a gif from his reply that could be quirkily reinterpreted as having some latent unexpected meaning and see if someone follows the thread with me.

good reply but you're wrong, you should grow some non-estrogenic brain cells otherwise it is like watching the titanic sink.
your sentience moggery only carries you so far as long as you ignore natural hierarchies and animal nature.
imagine seeing a massive karate champion lose to a lowlife cretin cause the category is boxing in a boxing ring,
that's you vs. noonz, or my pet often, perverted to even watch.

@"just a guy from europe"

that would be valid if hormones in nature weren't governed by a horseshoe theory. The highest "masculinity" becomes estrogenic and vice versa. I can't even detect a human in undisputed esque posters to begin with. you need a human to be able to perceive a threat to begin with if we're going to stick with the natural.determinism.on.online.forums metaphor just note at the end of the day, im typing on a screen in a developed country hundreds of kilometres away from any other posters.  The conversation can't even begin until there's an actual person there. There's not even a lowlife cretin there as far as I'm concerned. 

in any case, i'll post this video again, it speaks for itself:



sincerely, 

6'0" man with 7 inch cock, wide frame, and strong calves

still a good reply, but you would lose again, it's like you talk around the fact that, firstly, testosterone based social fighting styles exist like ladders on a game board, most of which you choose to ignore out of self esteem issues for a heavily limited mostly matriarchical style of social dominance (le intellectual dominatrix archetype with some classically and thus naturally masculine archetypical defenses similar to the vid in your answer), and secondly, we live in a patriarchy, of an ironically anti-patriarchical unnatural nature, so you even lose in this additional playing field of convoluted simulacra of natural dominance rights that instantly catapults losers like noonz and psychopathic behavior of lowlives in general to #1 while sadisticslly tackling anything feminine and wise on sight, just for the masochistic "fun" of it.

you call it talking around, I call it questioning the grounds on which you're suggesting undisputedposting is a form of "natural dominance." The second humans got language was the second it became impossible to cite "nature" as a stable ground. in any case as I said, I still have that ladder on my game board. it's just not rewarding to use it in the context of this forum. it's only fun to use it here and there so I can have a handful of posters. maybe you'd be saying otherwise if you saw my gregor clegane avi era on lookism circa 2021. And that was only fun at the time because I knew I'd be getting posters negging me about how "i know you're actually a twink This doesn't work!!!" Basically, it was only fun because it wasn't my only ladder.

Even if we assumed nature was deterministic, from ground zero it was never clear whether femininity or masculinity is natural dominance since the success of each one can only be determined with reference to the other.