reminder: my pet was bashing crypto when bitcoin was ~$17,000 in Summer 2022

[bluerose]

nice try at defending him, he's not an expert in epistemology or law.


cute!

is this a serious claim or just another attempt of yours to get my attention?

not that i need your reply to get my answer, but ... you aren't exactly reading journals publishing papers in those fields, are you?

I think you would easily epistemology mog my pet if you tried, then law is just largely outdated ways to protect personal rights of citizens.

no wonder my pet has this hunger for academia tier theorizing, he realizes his field is largely removed from true intellectual discourse, like bark around a tree.

personal rights, that's a beautiful theme, tho, I think he agrees, hence his theatrical nature, calling himself altruist and all that, his best alt name btw.

1. you quoted me instead of slop
2. "law is just largely outdated ways to protect personal rights of citizens" - this disqualifies you as a serious interlocutor about law more than saying 2+2 equals 2445.25 would do the same for math
3. "he realizes his field is largely removed from true intellectual discourse, like bark around a tree." - so blatantly stupid it's obvious that this is is just your desperate attempt to get an emotional reaction out of me. quality exchange of legal briefs between elite lawyers requires more iq/intellect than producing ramblings 90% of hard science papers are based on
4. "personal rights, that's a beautiful theme," - there's no such thing as "personal rights" in law (not that you'll understand or have any clue about this, but, by "law", i'm referring to both the common law and the civil law system), unless i've been so drugged out that i've missed the fact that we're all living in peak SSSR and posting on a forum funded by the KGB. just fucking lol. see 3. and magnify it by 5. it takes having read 3 news articles about unfair verdicts to know it's "civil rights", and definitely not "personal" rights as you are imagining it.

I think he agrees

the value of your thoughts about me agreeing with the preposterous bullshit you've written earlier in this post is not exactly existent in any meaningful sense of the word

personal rights, with human rights at their core, are what ur entire field is based on and what makes it special.

u expose urself as a bad intellectual by attacking that for muh certificates and ig moggery cred.