thinking about returning to looksmax
#30
(02-02-2024, 12:58 AM)bluerose Wrote:
(02-02-2024, 12:53 AM)Michelangelo Wrote:
(02-02-2024, 12:49 AM)bluerose Wrote:
(02-02-2024, 12:47 AM)Michelangelo Wrote: wittgenstein was a schizophrenic fag who changed his opinion on the topics of his interest every two weeks. no idea where did you find this negative iq interpretation of his writings (read the prologue to tractatus), but this is from the period where he made at least some sense:

[Image: 006ca4e2af382bf7c60ba36b83d2db32.jpg]

oh yeah that was infamous.
he later changed his opinion.

proof I iq-mog you, effortless victory! 

hat

the one i quoted was good, the one you copied was literally meaningless in both the linguistic and the philosophical sense

why do you think it is good.
o.o
srs

quote is not even an oxymoron in itself, for bragging purposes he says he is wise yet denies wisdom, then it is even more bragging with describing pain tolerance as high pedigree via an implied self-directed ad hominem, as a troubled philosopher turned celeb.

would take me too much energy to elaborate

but does anyone except retard-tier religious people think we exist to experience bliss from womb to tomb? in fact, not even those people believe that, they tell themselves their struggle is gonna pay off when they drop dead and shit themselves
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: thinking about returning to looksmax - by sin - 01-02-2024, 10:51 AM
RE: thinking about returning to looksmax - by Altruist - 02-02-2024, 01:00 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)