02-02-2024, 12:58 AM
(02-02-2024, 12:53 AM)Michelangelo Wrote:(02-02-2024, 12:49 AM)bluerose Wrote:(02-02-2024, 12:47 AM)Michelangelo Wrote:(02-02-2024, 12:44 AM)bluerose Wrote: i'm not useless if I can be happy, I thought u agreed with wittgenstein on that.
from a reddit thread:
*"ACCORDING TO WITTGENSTEIN, the worthwhile life is one that is lived happily. He feels such a life needs no justification, for it is justified in itself. He says, "I keep on coming back to this! simply the happy life is good, the unhappy bad. And if I now ask myself: But why should I live happily, then this of itself seems to me to be a tautological question; the happy life seems to be justified, of itself, it seems that it is the only right life."2 This is why he issues the imperative, "Live happily!"
wittgenstein was a schizophrenic fag who changed his opinion on the topics of his interest every two weeks. no idea where did you find this negative iq interpretation of his writings (read the prologue to tractatus), but this is from the period where he made at least some sense:
oh yeah that was infamous.
he later changed his opinion.
proof I iq-mog you, effortless victory!
the one i quoted was good, the one you copied was literally meaningless in both the linguistic and the philosophical sense
why do you think it is good.
o.o
srs
quote is not even an oxymoron in itself, for bragging purposes he says he is wise yet denies wisdom, then it is even more bragging with describing pain tolerance as high pedigree via an implied self-directed ad hominem, as a troubled philosopher turned celeb.


![[Image: 006ca4e2af382bf7c60ba36b83d2db32.jpg]](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/00/6c/a4/006ca4e2af382bf7c60ba36b83d2db32.jpg)
