Sexual liberation is a myth in America.

[MysteriousWeeb420]

another day, another butthurt AOC cuck. imagine making an account because of this

why do these sites attract so many racists/antisemites, pedos, homophobes, neets, gore watchers and all the other human trash to this extent? are these topics so closely related to "looksmaxing" discussions? i don't think so

I'll ask again, why is being a homophobe a bad thing? Why is it bad to say adults fucking high schoolers is okay, but gays fucking each other is bad?

You act like this is plain truth. You are pretty fucking brainwashed.

it's pretty simple really. homosexual men and women can consent but young teenagers are still developing mentally so they are in a position to be taken advantage of

teenagers can consent.

also anyone can be taken advantage of.

your arguments are feminist in nature

let me ask you something. is it easier to manipulate an adult or a teenager?

we are trying to minimise suffering and maximise wellbeing here

the best way to do this is to draw a line where below it lots of abuse would occur and above it not so much

[bookie]

another day, another butthurt AOC cuck. imagine making an account because of this

why do these sites attract so many racists/antisemites, pedos, homophobes, neets, gore watchers and all the other human trash to this extent? are these topics so closely related to "looksmaxing" discussions? i don't think so

I'll ask again, why is being a homophobe a bad thing? Why is it bad to say adults fucking high schoolers is okay, but gays fucking each other is bad?

You act like this is plain truth. You are pretty fucking brainwashed.

it's pretty simple really. homosexual men and women can consent but young teenagers are still developing mentally so they are in a position to be taken advantage of

teenagers can consent.

also anyone can be taken advantage of.

your arguments are feminist in nature

let me ask you something. is it easier to manipulate an adult or a teenager?

we are trying to minimise suffering and maximise wellbeing here

the best way to do this is to draw a line where below it lots of suffering would occur and above it not so much

I would argue more suffering occurs in modern times where divorce rates are high than in the past when girls got married shortly after puberty.

On top of that, are there studies showing harm in areas that have an AoC of 14? I doubt it.

[bookie]

another day, another butthurt AOC cuck. imagine making an account because of this

why do these sites attract so many racists/antisemites, pedos, homophobes, neets, gore watchers and all the other human trash to this extent? are these topics so closely related to "looksmaxing" discussions? i don't think so

I'll ask again, why is being a homophobe a bad thing? Why is it bad to say adults fucking high schoolers is okay, but gays fucking each other is bad?

You act like this is plain truth. You are pretty fucking brainwashed.

it's pretty simple really. homosexual men and women can consent but young teenagers are still developing mentally so they are in a position to be taken advantage of

teenagers can consent.

also anyone can be taken advantage of.

your arguments are feminist in nature

let me ask you something. is it easier to manipulate an adult or a teenager?

we are trying to minimise suffering and maximise wellbeing here

the best way to do this is to draw a line where below it lots of abuse would occur and above it not so much

Also gays spread AIDs and Lesbians have highest rates of domestic abuse.

[MysteriousWeeb420]

I'll ask again, why is being a homophobe a bad thing? Why is it bad to say adults fucking high schoolers is okay, but gays fucking each other is bad?

You act like this is plain truth. You are pretty fucking brainwashed.

it's pretty simple really. homosexual men and women can consent but young teenagers are still developing mentally so they are in a position to be taken advantage of

teenagers can consent.

also anyone can be taken advantage of.

your arguments are feminist in nature

let me ask you something. is it easier to manipulate an adult or a teenager?

we are trying to minimise suffering and maximise wellbeing here

the best way to do this is to draw a line where below it lots of suffering would occur and above it not so much

I would argue more suffering occurs in modern times where divorce rates are high than in the past when girls got married shortly after puberty.

On top of that, are there studies showing harm in areas that have an AoC of 14? I doubt it.

no because before they would have to suffer through shit marriages and abuse 

age 6-16 study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693773/

[bookie]

no because before they would have to suffer through shit marriages and abuse 

age 6-16 study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693773/

Age 6-16? 
That's not a wide range at all bud.

Furthermore, not all sex is abuse, some is consensual and non abusive.

[MysteriousWeeb420]

no because before they would have to suffer through shit marriages and abuse 

age 6-16 study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693773/

Age 6-16? 
That's not a wide range at all bud.

cope, you just got rekt lol

[bookie]

no because before they would have to suffer through shit marriages and abuse 

age 6-16 study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693773/

Age 6-16? 
That's not a wide range at all bud.

cope, you just got rekt lol

No, I didn't, you're crowng yourself for using a study that is flawed compared to the question because it focuses on abusive sex, not non abusive sex.

[MysteriousWeeb420]

no because before they would have to suffer through shit marriages and abuse 

age 6-16 study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693773/

Age 6-16? 
That's not a wide range at all bud.

cope, you just got rekt lol

No, I didn't, you're crowng yourself for using a study that is flawed compared to the question because it focuses on abusive sex, not non abusive sex.

what sex with minors isn't abusive?

in before you cope with like the 0.1% of teenagers just below the aoc

[bookie]

no because before they would have to suffer through shit marriages and abuse 

age 6-16 study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693773/

Age 6-16? 
That's not a wide range at all bud.

cope, you just got rekt lol

No, I didn't, you're crowng yourself for using a study that is flawed compared to the question because it focuses on abusive sex, not non abusive sex.

what sex with minors isn't abusive?

in before you cope with like the 0.1% of teenagers just below the aoc

AoC varies.

For example if AoC is 18 in one area, does that mean 99.9% of consensual sex with 16-17 year olds is abusive?

[MysteriousWeeb420]

Age 6-16? 
That's not a wide range at all bud.

cope, you just got rekt lol

No, I didn't, you're crowng yourself for using a study that is flawed compared to the question because it focuses on abusive sex, not non abusive sex.

what sex with minors isn't abusive?

in before you cope with like the 0.1% of teenagers just below the aoc

AoC varies.

For example if AoC is 18 in one area, does that mean 99.9% of consensual sex with 16-17 year olds is abusive?

yeah laws vary 

ideal age of consent is around 16

[bookie]

cope, you just got rekt lol

No, I didn't, you're crowng yourself for using a study that is flawed compared to the question because it focuses on abusive sex, not non abusive sex.

what sex with minors isn't abusive?

in before you cope with like the 0.1% of teenagers just below the aoc

AoC varies.

For example if AoC is 18 in one area, does that mean 99.9% of consensual sex with 16-17 year olds is abusive?

yeah laws vary 

ideal age of consent is around 16

Argumentum ad populum fallacy.

So if AoC is 16 in one country, does that now mean 99.9% percent of consensual sex in a country where AoC is 14 is abusive?

[MysteriousWeeb420]

No, I didn't, you're crowng yourself for using a study that is flawed compared to the question because it focuses on abusive sex, not non abusive sex.

what sex with minors isn't abusive?

in before you cope with like the 0.1% of teenagers just below the aoc

AoC varies.

For example if AoC is 18 in one area, does that mean 99.9% of consensual sex with 16-17 year olds is abusive?

yeah laws vary 

ideal age of consent is around 16

Argumentum ad populum fallacy.

So if AoC is 16 in one country, does that now mean 99.9% percent of consensual sex in a country where AoC is 14 is abusive?

when did I reference popularity?

yeah I think 14 is definitely too low. more bad than good comes from that

[bookie]

what sex with minors isn't abusive?

in before you cope with like the 0.1% of teenagers just below the aoc

AoC varies.

For example if AoC is 18 in one area, does that mean 99.9% of consensual sex with 16-17 year olds is abusive?

yeah laws vary 

ideal age of consent is around 16

Argumentum ad populum fallacy.

So if AoC is 16 in one country, does that now mean 99.9% percent of consensual sex in a country where AoC is 14 is abusive?

when did I reference popularity?

yeah I think 14 is definitely too low. more bad than good comes from that

Prove it.

[God]

You can’t fuck high schoolers unless you are a high schooler yourself

Wrong, AoC in Europe is 14-15 in most places. Meaning they can consent with anyone older no matter the age gap.

but they won't fuck older guys. they only date boys their age

[kathisterima]

Can we just agree that it's extremely pathetic for a guy in 20's or older to want to fuck 14-15 year olds? I mean regardless of consent laws, how do you even get to meet a 15 year old? You sit outside schools and wait for them to finish class? You enter the boyscouts? You hide in a dark alley and wait for your chance to mug and rape them? It's just pathetic from every way you look at it.