[Black Pill]
 Examples of girls for every PSL imo [GTFIH] [BLACKPILL] [IMPORTANT]
#31
(22-02-2023, 03:31 PM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 03:07 PM)brocode Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 03:02 PM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 02:47 PM)brocode Wrote: No it does make sense, percentile is different from raw score.
The distribution of Lookz is normal (bell curve) and not equal.

What you say would you be correct if 10% of the population was 1/10, 10% of the population was 2/10, 10% of the population was 3/10.. and so on.

But it’s not that way.
Barely 2% of the population is 1/10, but there are more 3/10 girls, more than 10%.

It’s a graph like this

 

read what I wrote again. I said that the average person wouldnt understand it in this way. yeah your rubric might be "technically" correct, but it doesnt make sense to your average person

So? Just because the average person lacks the comprehension skills, doesn’t mean I’m gonna change it and make it less accurate

that doesnt change the fact that you misunderstand what I originally wrote. youre just sidestepping now

secondly, youre entitled to use whatever rubric you want, but dont expect people to be able to understand it

Well what were you trying to say?

And about that second part, I have firm belief in Lookism and like I believed, a lot of people did understand.
Reply
#32
(22-02-2023, 04:29 PM)brocode Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 03:31 PM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 03:07 PM)brocode Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 03:02 PM)lonelyjak Wrote: read what I wrote again. I said that the average person wouldnt understand it in this way. yeah your rubric might be "technically" correct, but it doesnt make sense to your average person

So? Just because the average person lacks the comprehension skills, doesn’t mean I’m gonna change it and make it less accurate

that doesnt change the fact that you misunderstand what I originally wrote. youre just sidestepping now

secondly, youre entitled to use whatever rubric you want, but dont expect people to be able to understand it

Well what were you trying to say?

And about that second part, I have firm belief in Lookism and like I believed, a lot of people did understand.

this is what I originally wrote:

"the average person would use a looks scale that is something like what im envisioning; they wouldnt be using this "4/10 is 75th percentile" type stuff. that makes no sense at all"

I was always talking about how an average person would perceive this. I said that your rating scale makes no sense at all in the context of how an average person would see it

personally I see no need to reinvent the wheel and come up with some unnecessarily convoluted and novel rating system but you do you
I relentlessly bully shitposters, /pol/faggots and admin. NO EXCEPTIONS!
Reply
#33
(22-02-2023, 05:57 PM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 04:29 PM)brocode Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 03:31 PM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 03:07 PM)brocode Wrote: So? Just because the average person lacks the comprehension skills, doesn’t mean I’m gonna change it and make it less accurate

that doesnt change the fact that you misunderstand what I originally wrote. youre just sidestepping now

secondly, youre entitled to use whatever rubric you want, but dont expect people to be able to understand it

Well what were you trying to say?

And about that second part, I have firm belief in Lookism and like I believed, a lot of people did understand.

this is what I originally wrote:

"the average person would use a looks scale that is something like what im envisioning; they wouldnt be using this "4/10 is 75th percentile" type stuff. that makes no sense at all"

I was always talking about how an average person would perceive this. I said that your rating scale makes no sense at all in the context of how an average person would see it

personally I see no need to reinvent the wheel and come up with some unnecessarily convoluted and novel rating system but you do you

Ok yeah I already addressed this. And no one is reinventing anything here, PSL rating has always been this way.
Reply
#34
(22-02-2023, 07:18 PM)brocode Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 05:57 PM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 04:29 PM)brocode Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 03:31 PM)lonelyjak Wrote: that doesnt change the fact that you misunderstand what I originally wrote. youre just sidestepping now

secondly, youre entitled to use whatever rubric you want, but dont expect people to be able to understand it

Well what were you trying to say?

And about that second part, I have firm belief in Lookism and like I believed, a lot of people did understand.

this is what I originally wrote:

"the average person would use a looks scale that is something like what im envisioning; they wouldnt be using this "4/10 is 75th percentile" type stuff. that makes no sense at all"

I was always talking about how an average person would perceive this. I said that your rating scale makes no sense at all in the context of how an average person would see it

personally I see no need to reinvent the wheel and come up with some unnecessarily convoluted and novel rating system but you do you

Ok yeah I already addressed this. And no one is reinventing anything here, PSL rating has always been this way.
no it hasnt, ive been at PSL for over a decade. the PSL rating functions as a conventional rating system, not this convoluted one that youre trying to promote

read through the entire thread again, theres at least 4-5 people that took issue with your rating system. if your PSL rating system has always been this way then why do so many people here disagree with your ratings? this obviously implies that your system is abnormal
I relentlessly bully shitposters, /pol/faggots and admin. NO EXCEPTIONS!
Reply
#35
(23-02-2023, 01:08 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 07:18 PM)brocode Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 05:57 PM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 04:29 PM)brocode Wrote: Well what were you trying to say?

And about that second part, I have firm belief in Lookism and like I believed, a lot of people did understand.

this is what I originally wrote:

"the average person would use a looks scale that is something like what im envisioning; they wouldnt be using this "4/10 is 75th percentile" type stuff. that makes no sense at all"

I was always talking about how an average person would perceive this. I said that your rating scale makes no sense at all in the context of how an average person would see it

personally I see no need to reinvent the wheel and come up with some unnecessarily convoluted and novel rating system but you do you

Ok yeah I already addressed this. And no one is reinventing anything here, PSL rating has always been this way.
no it hasnt, ive been at PSL for over a decade. the PSL rating functions as a conventional rating system, not this convoluted one that youre trying to promote

read through the entire thread again, theres at least 4-5 people that took issue with your rating system. if your PSL rating system has always been this way then why do so many people here disagree with your ratings? this obviously implies that your system is abnormal

Oh come on percentile is very common in PSL, when I was first introduced to it, the idea was that it worked by percentile.

X percentile = y PSL.

Like a 10PSL is 99.999999th percentile etc (that it actually doesn’t exist)
Reply
#36
(23-02-2023, 01:16 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:08 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 07:18 PM)brocode Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 05:57 PM)lonelyjak Wrote: this is what I originally wrote:

"the average person would use a looks scale that is something like what im envisioning; they wouldnt be using this "4/10 is 75th percentile" type stuff. that makes no sense at all"

I was always talking about how an average person would perceive this. I said that your rating scale makes no sense at all in the context of how an average person would see it

personally I see no need to reinvent the wheel and come up with some unnecessarily convoluted and novel rating system but you do you

Ok yeah I already addressed this. And no one is reinventing anything here, PSL rating has always been this way.
no it hasnt, ive been at PSL for over a decade. the PSL rating functions as a conventional rating system, not this convoluted one that youre trying to promote

read through the entire thread again, theres at least 4-5 people that took issue with your rating system. if your PSL rating system has always been this way then why do so many people here disagree with your ratings? this obviously implies that your system is abnormal

Oh come on percentile is very common in PSL, when I was first introduced to it, the idea was that it worked by percentile.

X percentile = y PSL.

Like a 10PSL is 99.999999th percentile etc (that it actually doesn’t exist)
im clearly talking about your weighted percentile system, not a conventional percentile system. the conventional percentile system that everyone is familiar with goes like:

10PSL=99.9th percentile
9PSL=90th percentile
8PSL=80th percentile
7PSL=70th percentile
6PSL=60th percentile
5PSL=50th percentile
4PSL=40th percentile
3PSL=30th percentile
2PSL=20th percentile
1PSL=10th percentile

nobody uses that weighted percentile system youve been trying to promote throughout this thread
I relentlessly bully shitposters, /pol/faggots and admin. NO EXCEPTIONS!
Reply
#37
(23-02-2023, 01:20 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:16 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:08 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 07:18 PM)brocode Wrote: Ok yeah I already addressed this. And no one is reinventing anything here, PSL rating has always been this way.
no it hasnt, ive been at PSL for over a decade. the PSL rating functions as a conventional rating system, not this convoluted one that youre trying to promote

read through the entire thread again, theres at least 4-5 people that took issue with your rating system. if your PSL rating system has always been this way then why do so many people here disagree with your ratings? this obviously implies that your system is abnormal

Oh come on percentile is very common in PSL, when I was first introduced to it, the idea was that it worked by percentile.

X percentile = y PSL.

Like a 10PSL is 99.999999th percentile etc (that it actually doesn’t exist)
im clearly talking about your weighted percentile system, not a conventional percentile system. the conventional percentile system that everyone is familiar with goes like:

10PSL=99.9th percentile
9PSL=90th percentile
8PSL=80th percentile
7PSL=70th percentile
6PSL=60th percentile
5PSL=50th percentile
4PSL=40th percentile
3PSL=30th percentile
2PSL=20th percentile
1PSL=10th percentile

nobody uses that weighted percentile system youve been trying to promote throughout this thread

What? They do though, why do u think on old Lookism threads Chico and other models get rated 8 PSL?
Surely they r not 80th percentile
Okay then explain me why they get rated that way since I don’t know anything

What
Reply
#38
(23-02-2023, 01:22 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:20 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:16 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:08 AM)lonelyjak Wrote: no it hasnt, ive been at PSL for over a decade. the PSL rating functions as a conventional rating system, not this convoluted one that youre trying to promote

read through the entire thread again, theres at least 4-5 people that took issue with your rating system. if your PSL rating system has always been this way then why do so many people here disagree with your ratings? this obviously implies that your system is abnormal

Oh come on percentile is very common in PSL, when I was first introduced to it, the idea was that it worked by percentile.

X percentile = y PSL.

Like a 10PSL is 99.999999th percentile etc (that it actually doesn’t exist)
im clearly talking about your weighted percentile system, not a conventional percentile system. the conventional percentile system that everyone is familiar with goes like:

10PSL=99.9th percentile
9PSL=90th percentile
8PSL=80th percentile
7PSL=70th percentile
6PSL=60th percentile
5PSL=50th percentile
4PSL=40th percentile
3PSL=30th percentile
2PSL=20th percentile
1PSL=10th percentile

nobody uses that weighted percentile system youve been trying to promote throughout this thread

What? They do though, why do u think on old Lookism threads Chico and other models get rated 8 PSL?
Surely they r not 80th percentile
Okay then explain me why they get rated that way since I don’t know anything

What

yeah PSL uses a conventional percentile rating system like the one I just posted, not your convoluted weighted one that you talked about in two separate comments on page 2:

Quote:my 4/10 is 75th percentile

and 3/10 is 40th percentile
and 1/10 is 5th percentile

Most girls objectively are not that hot. they are in between 3-4. 
yeah we r attracted to such girls, especially myself.
but I have to be very objective
you cant be lenient with lookz

your 4/10 is 75th percentile? WHAT? that makes no sense. thats hardly a conventional percentile system, but it is an example of your "special" weighted rating system

its obvious to me that youre trying to deflect and play dumb here, I dont even understand why. this is the stupidest argument ive ever been in
I relentlessly bully shitposters, /pol/faggots and admin. NO EXCEPTIONS!
Reply
#39
(23-02-2023, 01:27 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:22 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:20 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:16 AM)brocode Wrote: Oh come on percentile is very common in PSL, when I was first introduced to it, the idea was that it worked by percentile.

X percentile = y PSL.

Like a 10PSL is 99.999999th percentile etc (that it actually doesn’t exist)
im clearly talking about your weighted percentile system, not a conventional percentile system. the conventional percentile system that everyone is familiar with goes like:

10PSL=99.9th percentile
9PSL=90th percentile
8PSL=80th percentile
7PSL=70th percentile
6PSL=60th percentile
5PSL=50th percentile
4PSL=40th percentile
3PSL=30th percentile
2PSL=20th percentile
1PSL=10th percentile

nobody uses that weighted percentile system youve been trying to promote throughout this thread

What? They do though, why do u think on old Lookism threads Chico and other models get rated 8 PSL?
Surely they r not 80th percentile
Okay then explain me why they get rated that way since I don’t know anything

What

yeah PSL uses a conventional percentile rating system like the one I just posted, not your convoluted weighted one that you talked about in two separate comments on page 2:

Quote:my 4/10 is 75th percentile

and 3/10 is 40th percentile
and 1/10 is 5th percentile

Most girls objectively are not that hot. they are in between 3-4. 
yeah we r attracted to such girls, especially myself.
but I have to be very objective
you cant be lenient with lookz

your 4/10 is 75th percentile? WHAT? that makes no sense. thats hardly a conventional percentile system, but it is an example of your "special" weighted rating system

its obvious to me that youre trying to deflect and play dumb here, I dont even understand why. this is the stupidest argument ive ever been in

Oh come on so Chico and O’Pry and those other models are 80th percentile? You’re not answering me here.
I asked a genuine question.
And yes my 4/10 is a 75th percentile because most girls are between 3 and 4. I’m being very objective.
Reply
#40
(23-02-2023, 01:32 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:27 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:22 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:20 AM)lonelyjak Wrote: im clearly talking about your weighted percentile system, not a conventional percentile system. the conventional percentile system that everyone is familiar with goes like:

10PSL=99.9th percentile
9PSL=90th percentile
8PSL=80th percentile
7PSL=70th percentile
6PSL=60th percentile
5PSL=50th percentile
4PSL=40th percentile
3PSL=30th percentile
2PSL=20th percentile
1PSL=10th percentile

nobody uses that weighted percentile system youve been trying to promote throughout this thread

What? They do though, why do u think on old Lookism threads Chico and other models get rated 8 PSL?
Surely they r not 80th percentile
Okay then explain me why they get rated that way since I don’t know anything

What

yeah PSL uses a conventional percentile rating system like the one I just posted, not your convoluted weighted one that you talked about in two separate comments on page 2:

Quote:my 4/10 is 75th percentile

and 3/10 is 40th percentile
and 1/10 is 5th percentile

Most girls objectively are not that hot. they are in between 3-4. 
yeah we r attracted to such girls, especially myself.
but I have to be very objective
you cant be lenient with lookz

your 4/10 is 75th percentile? WHAT? that makes no sense. thats hardly a conventional percentile system, but it is an example of your "special" weighted rating system

its obvious to me that youre trying to deflect and play dumb here, I dont even understand why. this is the stupidest argument ive ever been in

Oh come on so Chico and O’Pry and those other models are 80th percentile? You’re not answering me here.
I asked a genuine question.
And yes my 4/10 is a 75th percentile because most girls are between 3 and 4. I’m being very objective.
youre sidestepping again. this is a stupid, pointless argument and I dont know why youre continuing it. 

1.multiple people in this thread have complained about your ratings = FACT

2.everyone at PSL uses the conventional percentile system which I listed above = FACT

3.you yourself are advocating some kind of weird weighted rating system where a 4/10 is a 75th percentile = FACT

just stop, youre being extremely annoying right now and also dishonest
I relentlessly bully shitposters, /pol/faggots and admin. NO EXCEPTIONS!
Reply
#41
(23-02-2023, 01:38 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:32 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:27 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:22 AM)brocode Wrote: What? They do though, why do u think on old Lookism threads Chico and other models get rated 8 PSL?
Surely they r not 80th percentile
Okay then explain me why they get rated that way since I don’t know anything

What

yeah PSL uses a conventional percentile rating system like the one I just posted, not your convoluted weighted one that you talked about in two separate comments on page 2:

Quote:my 4/10 is 75th percentile

and 3/10 is 40th percentile
and 1/10 is 5th percentile

Most girls objectively are not that hot. they are in between 3-4. 
yeah we r attracted to such girls, especially myself.
but I have to be very objective
you cant be lenient with lookz

your 4/10 is 75th percentile? WHAT? that makes no sense. thats hardly a conventional percentile system, but it is an example of your "special" weighted rating system

its obvious to me that youre trying to deflect and play dumb here, I dont even understand why. this is the stupidest argument ive ever been in

Oh come on so Chico and O’Pry and those other models are 80th percentile? You’re not answering me here.
I asked a genuine question.
And yes my 4/10 is a 75th percentile because most girls are between 3 and 4. I’m being very objective.
youre sidestepping again. this is a stupid, pointless argument and I dont know why youre continuing it. 

1.multiple people in this thread have complained about your ratings = FACT

2.everyone at PSL uses the conventional percentile system which I listed above = FACT

3.you yourself are advocating some kind of weird weighted rating system where a 4/10 is a 75th percentile = FACT

just stop, youre being extremely annoying right now and also dishonest

Dude I did not deny that, I literally said “yeah”. Are you blind? I said yes I do, I’ll bold it for you.
You seem to not understand I’m not sidestepping I’m trying to understand why I’m wrong.
When Chico and o pry are considered 8psl, how can it be 80th percentile? They’re very good looking and they can’t be 80th percentile.

How do you explain that is what I’m asking. I’m not denying anything here.
Reply
#42
(23-02-2023, 01:51 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:38 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:32 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:27 AM)lonelyjak Wrote: yeah PSL uses a conventional percentile rating system like the one I just posted, not your convoluted weighted one that you talked about in two separate comments on page 2:


your 4/10 is 75th percentile? WHAT? that makes no sense. thats hardly a conventional percentile system, but it is an example of your "special" weighted rating system

its obvious to me that youre trying to deflect and play dumb here, I dont even understand why. this is the stupidest argument ive ever been in

Oh come on so Chico and O’Pry and those other models are 80th percentile? You’re not answering me here.
I asked a genuine question.
And yes my 4/10 is a 75th percentile because most girls are between 3 and 4. I’m being very objective.
youre sidestepping again. this is a stupid, pointless argument and I dont know why youre continuing it. 

1.multiple people in this thread have complained about your ratings = FACT

2.everyone at PSL uses the conventional percentile system which I listed above = FACT

3.you yourself are advocating some kind of weird weighted rating system where a 4/10 is a 75th percentile = FACT

just stop, youre being extremely annoying right now and also dishonest

Dude I did not deny that, I literally said “yeah”. Are you blind? I said yes I do, I’ll bold it for you.
You seem to not understand I’m not sidestepping I’m trying to understand why I’m wrong.
When Chico and o pry are considered 8psl, how can it be 80th percentile? They’re very good looking and they can’t be 80th percentile.

How do you explain that is what I’m asking. I’m not denying anything here.
I dont care about chico or o pry or their ratings. this is a question that youre imposing on me. from the get go I have always been criticizing your weighted system, this has been my ONLY position IIRC. if you disagree with the way that chico or opry is rated then take it up with someone else, I literally dont care about this at all.
I relentlessly bully shitposters, /pol/faggots and admin. NO EXCEPTIONS!
Reply
#43
(23-02-2023, 01:58 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:51 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:38 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:32 AM)brocode Wrote: Oh come on so Chico and O’Pry and those other models are 80th percentile? You’re not answering me here.
I asked a genuine question.
And yes my 4/10 is a 75th percentile because most girls are between 3 and 4. I’m being very objective.
youre sidestepping again. this is a stupid, pointless argument and I dont know why youre continuing it. 

1.multiple people in this thread have complained about your ratings = FACT

2.everyone at PSL uses the conventional percentile system which I listed above = FACT

3.you yourself are advocating some kind of weird weighted rating system where a 4/10 is a 75th percentile = FACT

just stop, youre being extremely annoying right now and also dishonest

Dude I did not deny that, I literally said “yeah”. Are you blind? I said yes I do, I’ll bold it for you.
You seem to not understand I’m not sidestepping I’m trying to understand why I’m wrong.
When Chico and o pry are considered 8psl, how can it be 80th percentile? They’re very good looking and they can’t be 80th percentile.

How do you explain that is what I’m asking. I’m not denying anything here.
I dont care about chico or o pry or their ratings. this is a question that youre imposing on me. from the get go I have always been criticizing your weighted system, this has been my ONLY position IIRC. if you disagree with the way that chico or opry is rated then take it up with someone else, I literally dont care about this at all.

Alright man.

So you really think that chick who I posted as 4 is a 7?
Reply
#44
(23-02-2023, 01:59 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:58 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:51 AM)brocode Wrote:
(23-02-2023, 01:38 AM)lonelyjak Wrote: youre sidestepping again. this is a stupid, pointless argument and I dont know why youre continuing it. 

1.multiple people in this thread have complained about your ratings = FACT

2.everyone at PSL uses the conventional percentile system which I listed above = FACT

3.you yourself are advocating some kind of weird weighted rating system where a 4/10 is a 75th percentile = FACT

just stop, youre being extremely annoying right now and also dishonest

Dude I did not deny that, I literally said “yeah”. Are you blind? I said yes I do, I’ll bold it for you.
You seem to not understand I’m not sidestepping I’m trying to understand why I’m wrong.
When Chico and o pry are considered 8psl, how can it be 80th percentile? They’re very good looking and they can’t be 80th percentile.

How do you explain that is what I’m asking. I’m not denying anything here.
I dont care about chico or o pry or their ratings. this is a question that youre imposing on me. from the get go I have always been criticizing your weighted system, this has been my ONLY position IIRC. if you disagree with the way that chico or opry is rated then take it up with someone else, I literally dont care about this at all.

Alright man.

So you really think that chick who I posted as 4 is a 7?
the girl you posted as a 4 is a 6.5 or a weak 7 to me

I really cant understand why you would want to consider a 75th percentile girl as a 4/10 (which is confusing af) instead of just considering her as a 7.5/10. no point at all in the extra complexity and sliding scale bs etc

anyways, YOU DO YOU
I relentlessly bully shitposters, /pol/faggots and admin. NO EXCEPTIONS!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)