is this the ultra-IQ phenotype?

[Steppenwolf]

[Altruist]

Witten looks like he cant wipe his own ass

[Steppenwolf]

Witten looks like he cant wipe his own ass

idk, he just looks scary to me

&t=402s

[Steppenwolf]

after paying attention to the voice... is the dude even human? 

anyway, what i noticed is that what they share in common is overly masculinity, not in bruteness, but in the sense of angularity. the nose format makes it clearer, and the height of the skull is usually taller than normal (also seen by the nose falling in front of the philtrum)


ultra-IQ Chad vs forever midwitted impressionable babyfaced feminine anglo cuckold, lmao

[Altruist]

Idk, weak theorizing. The guy who'd make all these people look like drooling retards looked like this:

[Steppenwolf]

Idk, weak theorizing. The guy who'd make all these people look like drooling retards looked like this:

i mean alan turing does this disprove the theory as well. but it's hard to ignore when there's so many examples 

[Steppenwolf]

also he's a skull mogger, but yeah does not pass the other traits 

[10khitman]

I think it has a lot to do with the portrait style artists used back then. a lot of the time they would change features of the irl people to actually make them look like some conventional pheno. 

realistically if you look at geniuses from say the 20th century where we had photography most looked pretty different IE turing, tesla, wittgenstein, fischer, rachmaninoff, etc...

[Steppenwolf]

I think it has a lot to do with the portrait style artists used back then. a lot of the time they would change features of the irl people to actually make them look like some conventional pheno. 

realistically if you look at geniuses from say the 20th century where we had photography most looked pretty different IE turing, tesla, wittgenstein, fischer, rachmaninoff, etc...

they have the phenotype, tbh

i mean your point above is reasonable. but there are written descriptions, and more paintings from different angles. 
i don't think the 'strong' nose traits they share and the above average skull height would be portrayed so consistently if were so

[brocode]

yes definitely.

not only in the field of science but also in math/logic and humanties.

for example james madison, or even daniel bernoulli

[Steppenwolf]

yes definitely.

not only in the field of science but also in math/logic and humanties.

for example james madison, or even daniel bernoulli

good examples tbh

[eldajaal1488]

I think it has a lot to do with the portrait style artists used back then. a lot of the time they would change features of the irl people to actually make them look like some conventional pheno. 

realistically if you look at geniuses from say the 20th century where we had photography most looked pretty different IE turing, tesla, wittgenstein, fischer, rachmaninoff, etc...

welcome back silly inkel

[hurt]

after paying attention to the voice... is the dude even human? 

anyway, what i noticed is that what they share in common is overly masculinity, not in bruteness, but in the sense of angularity. the nose format makes it clearer, and the height of the skull is usually taller than normal (also seen by the nose falling in front of the philtrum)


ultra-IQ Chad vs forever midwitted impressionable babyfaced feminine anglo cuckold, lmao

did you just call iron dimon an anglo cuck? 

[Steppenwolf]

after paying attention to the voice... is the dude even human? 

anyway, what i noticed is that what they share in common is overly masculinity, not in bruteness, but in the sense of angularity. the nose format makes it clearer, and the height of the skull is usually taller than normal (also seen by the nose falling in front of the philtrum)


ultra-IQ Chad vs forever midwitted impressionable babyfaced feminine anglo cuckold, lmao

did you just call iron dimon an anglo cuck? 

i didn't even see the names tbh

[10khitman]

I think it has a lot to do with the portrait style artists used back then. a lot of the time they would change features of the irl people to actually make them look like some conventional pheno. 

realistically if you look at geniuses from say the 20th century where we had photography most looked pretty different IE turing, tesla, wittgenstein, fischer, rachmaninoff, etc...

they have the phenotype, tbh

i mean your point above is reasonable. but there are written descriptions, and more paintings from different angles. 
i don't think the 'strong' nose traits they share and the above average skull height would be portrayed so consistently if were so

the sharpness of their features indeed connects them but high iq individuals do also tend to be skinny very often. there are lots of examples of the big noses but also lots of counter examples, i dont know, there doesnt seem to be enough evidence to this.