God creating refutes him

[Eesharebba]

It's better to be an absolute creator than a limited one

Which means he created  evil and imperfection

Which would refute his omnibenevolence and perfection and mean he's not msximslly great ofcehich none higher can be concieved

So he doesn't exist

And by creating he either gains or loses a property meaning he was never msximslly great or he was contingent and thus not maximum greatness 

So he doesn't exist

[Altruist]

Unironically legit

This concept of god is just too basic, we should grow out of it already

[Eesharebba]

Unironically legit

This concept of god is just too basic, we should grow out of it already

A god only has the best properties no neutral ones so if creation is neutral he can't do it but if it is best he must always have done it

The universe is a brute fact

[psychoman]

It's better to be an absolute creator than a limited one

Which means he created  evil and imperfection

Which would refute his omnibenevolence and perfection and mean he's not msximslly great ofcehich none higher can be concieved

So he doesn't exist

And by creating he either gains or loses a property meaning he was never msximslly great or he was contingent and thus not maximum greatness 

So he doesn't exist

the described god in religions sure does not exist, but greater power than us definitely does. a kind who have dominant view on our existence, like how we look at ants insects and animals.
thinking we are the top beings in universe is just as stupid as thinking there is a omniscience god.