[LOL]
 Charlie Kirk's twitter following has gone up by millions, after his untimely demise
#1
Lightbulb 
So magatards are wondering what a dead and buried man might tweet next.

This is the IQ we are dealing with ladies and gentlemen. The Newsom presidency can't come fast enough
Reply
#2
hes a martyr for them
Reply
#3
(13-09-2025, 10:37 PM)machinelves Wrote: hes a martyr for them

Magatards are now the party of empathy, how touching
Reply
#4
he was dumb as fuck, lmao
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#5
(13-09-2025, 10:38 PM)Altruist Wrote: he was dumb as fuck, lmao

Absolutely, plus he had no formal education, as I mentioned on my latest scathing blog against his person
Reply
#6
I unfollowed already

No point damaging my follower to follow ratio. It's not like that nigga will rise from tomb to post anyways Green
[Image: ustalarmeclisi0002026-06-07-15-31-068945...bd7fba.jpg]
Reply
#7
(13-09-2025, 10:40 PM)Busty Doll Wrote: Absolutely, plus he had no formal education, as I mentioned on my latest scathing blog against his person

yeah. as someone who's been into academic publishing for over a decade now, he ticks the boxes of like 99% of no-gos in academic discourse

are we really supposed to be in awe of someone whose peak debating skill was ambushing random students with in-advance-prepared namedropping and shapiro tier fact-cherrypicking? i dont think so
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#8
i mean there is a chance he had social media managers or his wife had access to his account
Reply
#9
people have finally realized he has a big skull
Reply
#10
Just wanting to see posts from his family and people in charge now about the situation, or they just did it because hes dead. XXXtentacion effect.
Reply
#11
(13-09-2025, 10:43 PM)Altruist Wrote: are we really supposed to be in awe of someone whose peak debating skill was ambushing random students with in-advance-prepared namedropping and shapiro tier fact-cherrypicking? i dont think so

not in awe but at least give him some credit

he was debating students on the exact topics they were lectured on (from what I've USA university curriculums often contain classes about race, equity, social justice, and history of minorities) and made almost everybody look like an idiot. He was obviously not just some well-read midwit, he was a a naturally talented debater/public speaker.
Reply
#12
(13-09-2025, 10:58 PM)kathisterima Wrote: not in awe but at least give him some credit

he was debating students on the exact topics they were lectured on (from what I've USA university curriculums often contain classes about race, equity, social justice, and history of minorities) and made almost everybody look like an idiot. He was obviously not just some well-read midwit, he was a a naturally talented debater/public speaker.

he does deserve some credit for sure, but anything more than that? come on

Quote:and made almost everybody look like an idiot

equality of arms in his "debates"? not even once
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#13
he probably would have destroyed sam harris in a debate

   
Reply
#14
(13-09-2025, 10:43 PM)Altruist Wrote: yeah. as someone who's been into academic publishing for over a decade now, he ticks the boxes of like 99% of no-gos in academic discourse

are we really supposed to be in awe of someone whose peak debating skill was ambushing random students with in-advance-prepared namedropping and shapiro tier fact-cherrypicking? i dont think so

I read his Wiki and it said: "He participated in an uprising at his school against price increase of cookies."

So he was just an attention seeker from an early age. The last thing we need in this existential battle against the Russian people.
Reply
#15
(13-09-2025, 10:59 PM)Altruist Wrote: he does deserve some credit for sure, but anything more than that? come on


equality of arms in his "debates"? not even once

it was made a bigger deal than it is for sure, but that was expected

what pissed me off was that our cucks in the european parliament tried to hold a minute of silence for him

the left wing members objected of course

they'd happily agree if it was for George Floyd btw, they are no less subservient to USA
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: