women are magical beings
#1
thats why evolution is true
because women are magical, mystical, so, so superior and are never wrong... never!
they guide human evolution because they are always right, their selection just makes so much sense, its just so godly, they are goddesses and we can see that their choices makes sense, okay? dont question it, dont question evolution either
INCELS
Reply
#2
No one except reclusive low iq incels thinks that to begin with. It's always funny to see you guys argue with yourselves

Quite a base for shilling against evolution, btw, lmao. Let me guess, "it's just a theory"  Giggle

Why do some people appear to be genetically hardwired to be wrong on everything?
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#3
(13-09-2025, 09:06 AM)Altruist Wrote: No one except reclusive low iq incels thinks that to begin with. It's always funny to see you guys argue with yourselves

Quite a base for shilling against evolution, btw, lmao. Let me guess, "it's just a theory"  Giggle

Why do some people appear to be genetically hardwired to be wrong on everything?

darwin was a cold stone retard and we have more dysgenic people than ever! congratulations for following the blind
Reply
#4
this isnt the base for saying something obvious (that darwin was a retard) and even your favourite people that you bootlick clearly think so, funnily i agree with them, and its because i just dont follow the thought line of peasantry, whoever they are is irrelevant. and you cant say people dont follow this line of thought (that women drive evolution) when its their entire argument, and its everywhere. female worship is a fucking disease and its everywhere because those insane theories are the new gospels for the sheeple
Reply
#5
women are flesh sacks filled with poop and other gross things


also what my pet said tbh never heard anyone say this
Reply
#6
(13-09-2025, 10:35 AM)freddie Wrote: women are flesh sacks filled with poop and other gross things


also what my pet said tbh never heard anyone say this

This is true but for the sake of sociology I need to ask is the mold fucking with your sex drive or is it an opinion you hold regardless
Reply
#7
R-l is so easily provoked. Very stable. Stable genius is my guess.
Reply
#8
(13-09-2025, 07:34 PM)Sexual chocolate Wrote: This is true but for the sake of sociology I need to ask is the mold fucking with your sex drive or is it an opinion you hold regardless

I'm realizing more and more everyday that humans are ants and none of this matters
Reply
#9
They are magicians. They make your money disappear.
Reply
#10
(13-09-2025, 10:35 AM)freddie Wrote: women are flesh sacks filled with poop and other gross things


also what my pet said tbh never heard anyone say this

the default position of evolutionary psychology or darwinian evolution inherently assumes that women are the selectors of fitness or genes. the argument always boils down to women as those magical beings that can never be wrong
Reply
#11
(13-09-2025, 09:31 PM)ΛΟΓΟΣ Wrote: the default position of evolutionary psychology or darwinian evolution inherently assumes that women are the selectors of fitness or genes. the argument always boils down to women as those magical beings that can never be wrong

I don't think people think about it this hard when they see someone they like
Reply
#12
Therefore they should be sawn in half
Reply
#13
There must be a reason why theories belong to genius and the arduous self-imposed task of the debunker (of his own bunker) belongs to the “different-oh-so-different”
Dark 
Reply
#14
(14-09-2025, 11:27 AM)Darkeningstar Wrote: There must be a reason why theories belong to genius and the arduous self-imposed task of the debunker (of his own bunker) belongs to the “different-oh-so-different”

its over

Quote:To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree. When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but the old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in science. Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory. How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light, hardly concerns us more than how life itself originated; but I may remark that, as some of the lowest organisms, in which nerves cannot be detected, are capable of perceiving light, it does not seem impossible that certain sensitive elements in their sarcode should become aggregated and developed into nerves, endowed with this special sensibility.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)