Book tip for Dolly Buster
#1
[Image: 747417.jpg]
Reply
#2
probably in slopslinger's curriculum
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#3
(07-02-2026, 10:12 AM)RL_autist Wrote: probably in slopslinger's curriculum

It is unironically a good book to read, despite the cringe title and cover.
Reply
#4
(07-02-2026, 01:55 PM)Dreckssau Wrote: It is unironically a good book to read, despite the cringe title and cover.

i can unironically tell it fucking isn't with a 100% conviction
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#5
Faggot
Reply
#6
(07-02-2026, 01:59 PM)RL_autist Wrote: i can unironically tell it fucking isn't with a 100% conviction

Gender criticals read it for understanding Ray Blanchard.
Reply
#7
the gender thing is this simple:

1. genders physically/biologically arose throughout evolution because specialization of roles was a survivalist imperative considering 100% of species had 0 control over their environment back then (if religiontards had any functional brain cells, they'd use this as their first and only argument for the existence of god, but they don't)
2. humans gained a lot of control over their environment, so the mechanism of genders as an operationalization of evolutionary success started becoming more and more obsolete by the year.

that's it. no further retarded philosophizing necessary.
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#8
(07-02-2026, 02:10 PM)RL_autist Wrote: the gender thing is this simple:

1. genders physically/biologically arose throughout evolution because specialization of roles was a survival imperative considering 100% of species had 0 control over their environment back then (if religiontards had any functional brain cells, they'd use this as their first and only argument for the existence of god, but they don't)
2. humans gained a lot of control over their environment, so the mechanism of genders as an operationalization of evolutionary success started becoming more and more obsolete by the year.

that's it. no further retarded philosophizing necessary.

I mean, this could be used for people crossdressing for fun in the 1980's. Today children take puberty blocking hormones, men are sent to female prisons and claim that biological sex is a myth. If a muscular 6ft2 bodybuilder decides to 'overcome gender' by claiming to be a female and dressing in a skirt, the natural differences in the two sexes becomes more obvious and less obsolete.
Reply
#9
you shouldn't have replied to that post
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#10
Well, your post doesn't touch on the subject of the book. I could discuss it for hours. Clearly, you are not interested in the topic, which I don't blame you for. There are indeed thousands of better topics to focus on, especially if you personally have never suffered from any of the pathologies described. For Dolly Buster however, it would be an interesting, but uncomfortable read.
Reply
#11
i m just saying people in general are making this topic way more complex and perplexing than it is
(18-09-2025, 06:49 PM)MVP Wrote: i already said, rӏ is built different

Quote:[Image: Screenshot-2026-06-20-at-23-46-52-Lookis...-Lists.png]
Reply
#12
(07-02-2026, 02:48 PM)RL_autist Wrote: i m just saying people in general are making this topic way more complex and perplexing than it is

I do agree to a certain extent. My fascination with this topic is not necessarily healthy and a lot of people lose themselves, as gender activists or anti gender activists.
Reply
#13
AI tells me my pics are female

"Probably 3 childbirths"
Reply
#14
Cage2
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: