a logical reason to hate some redditors

[Altruist]

1. how could you argue that was the solution when the guy arbitrarily kept adding numbers to get the numbers in the sequence, lmao. just add x/y/z to your idea to fit the sequence, and then establish your own relation (he didnt even do that, tho, what's the justification for adding 8, of all even numbers?) between the numbers added



2. between 2 solutions, the simpler one is always considered correct (not that he solved it)

It wasn't arbitrary 

If it's odd you add the number if it's even you add 8 

Simpler is subjective

lol. i wouldnt say anything if he added 2, but he picked exactly the number that fits, lmao. why not 43821 for an odd number, or 60 for the even one? oh, it doesnt fit and he didnt even get 6 was a base, even that dumb curry got it

simplicity is usually objective, but thats not even important here because he didnt solve it

[Altruist]

I'm not trying to generalise to all redditors but I've noticed an annoying trend where if you dominate them in an argument they just stop responding and downvote all your comments. can you be any more of a pathetic bitch?

https://looksmax.org/threads/todays-iq-test-brutal-if-you-fail-this.511019/

tell this fag it's 112

It's not

no shit

i wanted to make you look dumb

midwits who think they are einsteins always post permutation based questions, so predictable

[Altruist]

next prime x n

where do you study math, in Shire?

[Altruist]

jesus christ, why are half the gifs missing

i m leaving the forum

[MysteriousWeeb420]

1. how could you argue that was the solution when the guy arbitrarily kept adding numbers to get the numbers in the sequence, lmao. just add x/y/z to your idea to fit the sequence, and then establish your own relation (he didnt even do that, tho, what's the justification for adding 8, of all even numbers?) between the numbers added



2. between 2 solutions, the simpler one is always considered correct (not that he solved it)

It wasn't arbitrary 

If it's odd you add the number if it's even you add 8 

Simpler is subjective

lol. i wouldnt say anything if he added 2, but he picked exactly the number that fits, lmao. why not 43821 for an odd number, or 60 for the even one? oh, it doesnt fit and he didnt even get 6 was a base, even that dumb curry got it

simplicity is usually objective, but thats not even important here because he didnt solve it

Because 8 fits 

If 43821 fitted then that would be reasonable imo 

If I had a sequence 8 16 24 32 you wouldn't have a problem with 8

[MysteriousWeeb420]

I'm not trying to generalise to all redditors but I've noticed an annoying trend where if you dominate them in an argument they just stop responding and downvote all your comments. can you be any more of a pathetic bitch?

https://looksmax.org/threads/todays-iq-test-brutal-if-you-fail-this.511019/

tell this fag it's 112

It's not

no shit

i wanted to make you look dumb

midwits who think they are einsteins always post permutation based questions, so predictable

Poor save

[MysteriousWeeb420]

next prime x n

where do you study math, in Shire?

I don't see what you're even trying to get at here. That's an adequate explanation of the solution

[Bookist]

why do people always throw random solutions around when trying to solve sequences/matrices



you dont even need to post the solution, just explain the pattern/key

mirin the state of mind where your subconscious is telling you you're wrong, but you still go with it. and most people operate like this in their daily lives, lol

[Altruist]

https://looksmax.org/threads/todays-iq-test-brutal-if-you-fail-this.511019/

tell this fag it's 112

It's not

no shit

i wanted to make you look dumb

midwits who think they are einsteins always post permutation based questions, so predictable

Poor save

there is a simple formula for this, dude

[Altruist]

next prime x n

where do you study math, in Shire?

I don't see what you're even trying to get at here. That's an adequate explanation of the solution

it's awful

even "next prime x [n(=1) + n]" looks better

[MysteriousWeeb420]

next prime x n

where do you study math, in Shire?

I don't see what you're even trying to get at here. That's an adequate explanation of the solution

it's awful

even "next prime x [n(=1) + n]" looks better

I'm trying to explain it in a way other people will understand. no one looks at this double bracket equal sign nonsense and understands. just like your insistence on putting a semicolon for a base - all it will do is confuse people