![]() |
|
foids should take mandatory sentience test to see if they can operate in society - Printable Version +- Lookism (https://bookism.net) +-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: foids should take mandatory sentience test to see if they can operate in society (/showthread.php?tid=50313) |
foids should take mandatory sentience test to see if they can operate in society - Mr Looks - 25-05-2026 can't leave house if she fails RE: foids should take mandatory sentience test to see if they can operate in society - bluerose - 25-05-2026 there's even worse tests for women unironically, if some girl held half da opinions da average incel does she'd be ostracized and mercilessly bullied to da verge of suicide by her female classmates for being a weirdo. RE: foids should take mandatory sentience test to see if they can operate in society - hitlersblackedwaifu - 25-05-2026 Nah man, I'm full on foid hate. We need Afghanistan type society where foods can't exit their homes but without the 70 iq sandniggering RE: foids should take mandatory sentience test to see if they can operate in society - hitlersblackedwaifu - 25-05-2026 (25-05-2026, 10:22 PM)bluerose Wrote: there's even worse tests for women unironically, if some girl held half da opinions da average incel does she'd be ostracized and mercilessly bullied to da verge of suicide by her female classmates for being a weirdo. Average foid is far more sexist than the avg incel what are u on abt RE: foids should take mandatory sentience test to see if they can operate in society - slop slinger - 25-05-2026 Nope They're the necessary other side to your shit reasonknowledgelogic coin And its been that way since the beginning of time Failed reasoning Every madness needs a method and vice versa Cringe RE: foids should take mandatory sentience test to see if they can operate in society - B00X - 26-05-2026 the dumb sluts are the only ones I would have a chance of sex with. |