+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. (/showthread.php?tid=31854)
Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - n9wiff - 23-02-2025
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - n9wiff - 23-02-2025
@Pi33baby
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - Pi33baby - 23-02-2025
(23-02-2025, 10:06 PM)n9wiff Wrote: @Pi33baby
Mvp has 0 on humor? Are you insane? He is the most entertaining member
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - Pi33baby - 23-02-2025
(23-02-2025, 10:07 PM)Pi33baby Wrote: Mvp has 0 on humor? Are you insane? He is the most entertaining member
I am the boogermench
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - n9wiff - 23-02-2025
(23-02-2025, 10:07 PM)Pi33baby Wrote: Mvp has 0 on humor? Are you insane? He is the most entertaining member
Added +1 point to your humor for this post
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - superiorpisspot234 - 23-02-2025
whoa
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - Altruist - 23-02-2025
pretty accurate
my humor should be 6 max, and activity 10, though. thread quality also 5-6 max, but you can't expect me to try considering the circumstances
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - n9wiff - 23-02-2025
(23-02-2025, 10:21 PM)Fred Stankovich Wrote: my humor should be 6 max, and activity 10, though.
I was gonna rank activity higher but I feel like you weren't as active as a a few weeks ago, or around the time prior to dismantling the firm
(23-02-2025, 10:07 PM)Pi33baby Wrote: Mvp has 0 on humor? Are you insane? He is the most entertaining member
Changed to a 2
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - Pi33baby - 23-02-2025
(23-02-2025, 10:24 PM)n9wiff Wrote: I was gonna rank activity higher but I feel like you weren't as active as a a few weeks ago, or around the time prior to dismantling the firm
Changed to a 2
There were two priests, catholic, taking a drive around town. A police car pulls out behind them and pulls them over, the cop steps out and tells them “we’re looking for two child molesters”. The priests look at each other, look at the cop, then say “we’ll do it!”
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - n9wiff - 23-02-2025
(23-02-2025, 10:31 PM)Pi33baby Wrote: There were two priests, catholic, taking a drive around town. A police car pulls out behind them and pulls them over, the cop steps out and tells them “we’re looking for two child molesters”. The priests look at each other, look at the cop, then say “we’ll do it!”
Pretty funny but keep in mind that it's a devil's tactic to try and ridicule and reduce the presence of the pillars of authority the Lord himself have placed down in the mortal world for us.
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - Altruist - 23-02-2025
(23-02-2025, 10:24 PM)n9wiff Wrote: I was gonna rank activity higher but I feel like you weren't as active as a a few weeks ago, or around the time prior to dismantling the firm
kath can confirm i m perpetually online. he just had me banned for those couple of weeks, hence your impression
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - n9wiff - 23-02-2025
Perpetual poster
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - cryingIRL - 23-02-2025
you will put my name on top of that list you have 20 minutes
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - n9wiff - 23-02-2025
[attachment=3172 Wrote:cryingIRL pid='181777' dateline='1740341712']you will put my name on top of that list you have 20 minutes
forgot
updated
RE: Bookism user scores based on humor, activity time and thread quality. - n9wiff - 23-02-2025
Quite cool that I rated all the stats blind and in random order
Yet after the final sum function and sort
It arranges itself into a pretty spot on visualisation of the posters ( in my opinion ) from best to worst