(27-03-2023, 11:03 AM)Mustang Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 11:21 AM)Born2Mog Wrote: that is cool

though never seen why destroying the enviroment would be seen as a negative tbh i hate the association of renewable energy with that. I want a renewable energy source that makes me feel like a coal burner

(27-03-2023, 11:55 AM)brocode Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 11:21 AM)Born2Mog Wrote: that is cool

though never seen why destroying the enviroment would be seen as a negative tbh i hate the association of renewable energy with that. I want a renewable energy source that makes me feel like a coal burner

Not just destroying the environment even if u take away 1 species of the food chain the whole environment can change, for example in the Yellowstone, they took away the wolves and just kept the reindeers in the forest and guess what? The whole forest went to shit in a year, uprooting and massive soil degradation everywhere.


And after a hasty review, after a few years, they decided to put the wolves back and literally within months, they saw changes, better environment etc
https://www.yellowstonepark.com/things-to-do/wildlife/wolf-reintroduction-changes-ecosystem/

(27-03-2023, 12:19 PM)Born2Mog Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 11:55 AM)brocode Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 11:21 AM)Born2Mog Wrote: that is cool

though never seen why destroying the enviroment would be seen as a negative tbh i hate the association of renewable energy with that. I want a renewable energy source that makes me feel like a coal burner

Not just destroying the environment even if u take away 1 species of the food chain the whole environment can change, for example in the Yellowstone, they took away the wolves and just kept the reindeers in the forest and guess what? The whole forest went to shit in a year, uprooting and massive soil degradation everywhere.


And after a hasty review, after a few years, they decided to put the wolves back and literally within months, they saw changes, better environment etc
https://www.yellowstonepark.com/things-to-do/wildlife/wolf-reintroduction-changes-ecosystem/

yes, true, environment is very finely tuned. 

i find it ironic so much focus is in on western countries on enviroment when these countries would be least affected. 

ex. dutch peoples have no reason to care about enviroment. (unless advanced tech = moral position) Their country is surrounded by giant sea-walls. Their farming is so advanced new ice age wouldn't do much.

in the entire western world economy is advanced and diverse enough to adapt, unlike most currently developing countries (the competition)

if i led the western world, id be starting a giant war, launching the nukes, or other drastic measures to keep hegemony while it's still possible. It's not impossible to reverse the course of history, even though not gonna happen.

a lot of the national parks originally were tended by native american populations that were driven out during the creation of them. Wolf/predator populations in the entire country were annihilated, replaced ecologically with humans. USA and europe has most advanced ecologists and biologists, the most raw talent in the entire world. They'd find a way to just make it work even if we have to eat algae locusts and jellyfishes only.

(27-03-2023, 12:23 PM)brocode Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 12:19 PM)Born2Mog Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 11:55 AM)brocode Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 11:21 AM)Born2Mog Wrote: that is cool

though never seen why destroying the enviroment would be seen as a negative tbh i hate the association of renewable energy with that. I want a renewable energy source that makes me feel like a coal burner

Not just destroying the environment even if u take away 1 species of the food chain the whole environment can change, for example in the Yellowstone, they took away the wolves and just kept the reindeers in the forest and guess what? The whole forest went to shit in a year, uprooting and massive soil degradation everywhere.


And after a hasty review, after a few years, they decided to put the wolves back and literally within months, they saw changes, better environment etc
https://www.yellowstonepark.com/things-to-do/wildlife/wolf-reintroduction-changes-ecosystem/

yes, true, environment is very finely tuned. 

i find it ironic so much focus is in on western countries on enviroment when these countries would be least affected. 

ex. dutch peoples have no reason to care about enviroment. (unless advanced tech = moral position) Their country is surrounded by giant sea-walls. Their farming is so advanced new ice age wouldn't do much.

in the entire western world economy is advanced and diverse enough to adapt, unlike most currently developing countries (the competition)

if i led the western world, id be starting a giant war, launching the nukes, or other drastic measures to keep hegemony while it's still possible. It's not impossible to reverse the course of history, even though not gonna happen.

a lot of the national parks originally were tended by native american populations that were driven out during the creation of them. Wolf/predator populations in the entire country were annihilated, replaced ecologically with humans. USA and europe has most advanced ecologists and biologists, the most raw talent in the entire world. They'd find a way to just make it work even if we have to eat algae locusts and jellyfishes only.

keep it green in the west, exploiting poor countries is for the best

(27-03-2023, 01:24 PM)10khitman Wrote: so just learn about nuclear energy which already has a million experts 

got it

(27-03-2023, 03:29 PM)brocode Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 01:24 PM)10khitman Wrote: so just learn about nuclear energy which already has a million experts 

got it

That is such a terrible way to think about it

"Everyone knows this, there is no reason why you shouldnt know it too"

(27-03-2023, 03:53 PM)10khitman Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 03:29 PM)brocode Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 01:24 PM)10khitman Wrote: so just learn about nuclear energy which already has a million experts 

got it

That is such a terrible way to think about it

"Everyone knows this, there is no reason why you shouldnt know it too"

thats not what im saying

hes implying it as some neuveau study like it isnt already utterly saturated and mainstream

its just knowledge for the sake of knowledge which is fine but why present it as some revolutionary study in saving the environment

(27-03-2023, 04:11 PM)brocode Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 03:53 PM)10khitman Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 03:29 PM)brocode Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 01:24 PM)10khitman Wrote: so just learn about nuclear energy which already has a million experts 

got it

That is such a terrible way to think about it

"Everyone knows this, there is no reason why you shouldnt know it too"

thats not what im saying

hes implying it as some neuveau study like it isnt already utterly saturated and mainstream

its just knowledge for the sake of knowledge which is fine but why present it as some revolutionary study in saving the environment

it does save the environment a lot though, these small changes are what make the big differences.

why do u think apple removed the charging brick from their iphone boxes? so that the boxes could be smaller.
and why did they want to make the boxes smaller?

small boxes => more no. of boxes in a container, lesser container, lesser fuel costs, more iphones shipped, more paper saved, paper money saved, free charging brick cost saved, more money from selling charging bricks.

one small action, saving them millions in supply chain and making them more cash.

small things make the big differences.

(27-03-2023, 03:53 PM)10khitman Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 03:29 PM)brocode Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 01:24 PM)10khitman Wrote: so just learn about nuclear energy which already has a million experts 

got it

That is such a terrible way to think about it

"Everyone knows this, there is no reason why you shouldnt know it too"

thats not what im saying

hes implying it as some neuveau study like it isnt already utterly saturated and mainstream

its just knowledge for the sake of knowledge which is fine but why present it as some revolutionary study in saving the environment

(27-03-2023, 04:35 PM)kathisterima Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 03:53 PM)10khitman Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 03:29 PM)brocode Wrote:

(27-03-2023, 01:24 PM)10khitman Wrote: so just learn about nuclear energy which already has a million experts 

got it

That is such a terrible way to think about it

"Everyone knows this, there is no reason why you shouldnt know it too"

thats not what im saying

hes implying it as some neuveau study like it isnt already utterly saturated and mainstream

its just knowledge for the sake of knowledge which is fine but why present it as some revolutionary study in saving the environment

that's not what I said

it's silly that you even thought that, it sounds like you are talking to yourself here

I'm writing this thread as a followup to another thread brocode made about startup ideas