+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: there is no biological imperative for sex (/showthread.php?tid=13706)
there is no biological imperative for sex - Born2Mog - 12-03-2023
obviously most humans have a sexual instinct (as well as sleeping, the north pole, artistic)
But to go on the assumption that there is a sort of overarching, organizing biological imperative for sex is just circular reasoning between our culture and the teleological argument. More likely, species just reproduce because of survivorship bias.
A species with a overdriving biological imperative for sex would be in every other way worse than a species that just happens to reproduce because they had free time and were bored.
extrapolating from inductive biological principle = IMPOSSIBLE without preconceived notions
to debunk psychoanalytic theory, just change sexual drive -> drive
Hence the "blackpill" is invalidated - sure maybe the principles are correct, but who are you to make a judgment on the "bluepilled normie/subhuman" as inferior to you?
RE: there is no biological imperative for sex - Altruist - 12-03-2023
I m a nigger
RE: there is no biological imperative for sex - Born2Mog - 12-03-2023
(12-03-2023, 06:47 PM)fat and curious Wrote: I m a nigger
focus on crime