![]() |
|
[Black Pill] A very basic proof of the blackpill - Printable Version+- Lookism (https://bookism.net) +-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: [Black Pill] A very basic proof of the blackpill (/showthread.php?tid=13058) |
A very basic proof of the blackpill - Repsel1001 - 13-02-2023 Here is a demonstration of from r/IncelTear Or, "If you look good, it doesn't matter what your personality is like". Scene A: Jeremy Meeks Scene B: Joseph Merrick Scene C: Think about it like so, personality doesn't get passed on genetically, looks do. Ergo, what's going to be judged in evolutionary mating? RE: A very basic proof of the blackpill - kathisterima - 13-02-2023 people on inceltear overall have bad takes, but as long as they align on bashing incels and presenting women as victims, they are fine with that and upvote each other. this comment for example Quote:Being nice is the bare minimum. If you're acting nice just to get something in return..you're not nice. Even if you bullshit everything about you to attract a woman. Not many women like liars. Maybe work on your personality and think of women as people instead of a trophy. ![]() contradiction upon contradiction upon contradiction they re such lolcows RE: A very basic proof of the blackpill - Repsel1001 - 13-02-2023 (13-02-2023, 02:41 AM)kathisterima Wrote: people on inceltear overall have bad takes, but as long as they align on bashing incels and presenting women as victims, they are fine with that and upvote each other. It makes sense, they're saying "treat people as people first and foremost without expectations of anything in return", the problem is that people like Meeks beat women and children and prove that that doesn't matter at all. RE: A very basic proof of the blackpill - kathisterima - 13-02-2023 (13-02-2023, 04:01 AM)Repsel1001 Wrote: It makes sense, they're saying "treat people as people first and foremost without expectations of anything in return", the problem is that people like Meeks beat women and children and prove that that doesn't matter at all. it really doesn't if you think about it -you are generally not expected to be nice to people (of course context is important, and that doesn't mean you should be rude) -while not completely realistic, wanting people who you treat nice to be nice back at you is not unreasonable, or an entitlement -of course, no one likes liars, but you are not introducing yourself as one, so that's irrelevant. And why is she talking about what women like anyways? Redpill much? They are people, not trophies. their comment doesn't follow a train of thought whatsoever, it's all over the place they got the motto (respect women, fix personality), but they fail to pair it with the thread's context RE: A very basic proof of the blackpill - Repsel1001 - 14-02-2023 (13-02-2023, 04:48 AM)kathisterima Wrote:(13-02-2023, 04:01 AM)Repsel1001 Wrote: It makes sense, they're saying "treat people as people first and foremost without expectations of anything in return", the problem is that people like Meeks beat women and children and prove that that doesn't matter at all. You're right, what they're trying to say is, "personality is the gate lock, if you can't get past it, it's over, but if you do, it doesn't mean it's began, you need shit afterward too", which only confirms our idea that looks nails it afterward. Anyone can fix their personality, but only looksmaxxing fixes you face. |