(17-11-2022, 08:10 AM)brocode Wrote:

(17-11-2022, 08:10 AM)brocode Wrote:

(17-11-2022, 09:13 AM)Zeus Wrote:

(17-11-2022, 08:10 AM)brocode Wrote:

Lol it’s fake you think they would be so stupid to do a patent under their name?

(17-11-2022, 12:36 PM)bloodshore Wrote: Lots of people "get corona" even though they had three shots

I don't believe in vaxx generally. There might be some legitimacy to them, but all the other crap that they put inside them outweighs any positive outcome from them

Not sure about the depopulation thing, sperm quality and birth rates are going down anyways

(18-11-2022, 04:15 AM)Machink Wrote: No fucking lol

It carries some risk but less than live infection. In a perfect world I suppose you wouldn’t get exposed to either but for most non hermit people, it makes more sense to just get vaccinated unless you are fine with wearing an n99 indefinitely. 

If the mRNA delivery route is frightening to someone they could just opt for older tech used in the novavax 

As far as risks do go, yes there seems to be a slight risk in either case (vax vs infection) of things like myocarditis and autoimmune disease(lots of people citing “long covid” and given the research on endothelial issues and certain autoantibodies being present, some people even having abnormal pet scans indicative of hypo metabolism, I’m not inclined to write the whole phenomena off as mass hysteria) 

Lots of people getting hematological issues post covid too like blood clots. Certain markers for coagulation (eg. D dimer) are high in these cohorts too 

All in all, we are already at the point where most people worldwide have both received 1+ Jab and 1+ infection. Best to avoid any exposure to the spike protein imo but the question is going to be repeat infection/booster risk and incidence rate of complications from either

One big issue I see with boosters is the rate of mutation. This virus is mutating fast af and by the time you get your annual booster, there will likely be new variants that evade prior immunity lol

Spoiler

(18-11-2022, 04:46 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:

(18-11-2022, 04:15 AM)Machink Wrote: No fucking lol

It carries some risk but less than live infection. In a perfect world I suppose you wouldn’t get exposed to either but for most non hermit people, it makes more sense to just get vaccinated unless you are fine with wearing an n99 indefinitely. 

If the mRNA delivery route is frightening to someone they could just opt for older tech used in the novavax 

As far as risks do go, yes there seems to be a slight risk in either case (vax vs infection) of things like myocarditis and autoimmune disease(lots of people citing “long covid” and given the research on endothelial issues and certain autoantibodies being present, some people even having abnormal pet scans indicative of hypo metabolism, I’m not inclined to write the whole phenomena off as mass hysteria) 

Lots of people getting hematological issues post covid too like blood clots. Certain markers for coagulation (eg. D dimer) are high in these cohorts too 

All in all, we are already at the point where most people worldwide have both received 1+ Jab and 1+ infection. Best to avoid any exposure to the spike protein imo but the question is going to be repeat infection/booster risk and incidence rate of complications from either

One big issue I see with boosters is the rate of mutation. This virus is mutating fast af and by the time you get your annual booster, there will likely be new variants that evade prior immunity lol

listen faggot, what part of "SCHIZOS ONLY!" do you not understand?

Spoiler