+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: rate julius caesar (/showthread.php?tid=10431)
rate julius caesar - AntonioJuraz - 09-11-2022
RE: rate julius caesar - bloodshore - 09-11-2022
Was most likely gay
RE: rate julius caesar - AntonioJuraz - 09-11-2022
(09-11-2022, 03:38 PM)bloodshore Wrote: Was most likely gay
no one was gay back then, it's a modern day hormone issue or abuse
RE: rate julius caesar - bloodshore - 09-11-2022
(09-11-2022, 03:57 PM)AntonioJuraz Wrote:(09-11-2022, 03:38 PM)bloodshore Wrote: Was most likely gay
no one was gay back then, it's a modern day hormone issue or abuse
Most roman were gay back then
Especially the rich oldcels
RE: rate julius caesar - AntonioJuraz - 09-11-2022
(09-11-2022, 03:58 PM)bloodshore Wrote:(09-11-2022, 03:57 PM)AntonioJuraz Wrote:(09-11-2022, 03:38 PM)bloodshore Wrote: Was most likely gay
no one was gay back then, it's a modern day hormone issue or abuse
Most roman were gay back then
Especially the rich oldcels
everything you read about roman history is fake
RE: rate julius caesar - Honest - 09-11-2022
(09-11-2022, 04:00 PM)AntonioJuraz Wrote:(09-11-2022, 03:58 PM)bloodshore Wrote:(09-11-2022, 03:57 PM)AntonioJuraz Wrote:(09-11-2022, 03:38 PM)bloodshore Wrote: Was most likely gay
no one was gay back then, it's a modern day hormone issue or abuse
Most roman were gay back then
Especially the rich oldcels
everything you read about roman history is fake
Stop coping, they were gay asf