(01-03-2025, 05:35 PM)n9wiff Wrote: BTC is easy as fuck to launder

(01-03-2025, 08:36 PM)Altruist Wrote: no, it isn't. every "argument" for crypto is low iq nonsense, including this idiocy. 

i literally posted about a case of mine related to "bullet proof servers" and using crypto payments for anonymization/privacy purposes - national CERTs, the Interpol and the FBI easily tracked down every single retard buying those servers with bitcoin. the state attorney who is on the case, with the help of digital forensics experts, of course, even dug out posts of all those retards on darknet forums where they were communicating years ago. when i call these people retards, i mean retards compared to guys like me, not full blown retards - those were technologically literate people with serious net worth.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54204356. this exact case, among other institutions that were hacked from those servers during that period. i have the indictment and the digitalized part of the entire case file (800+ pages) on this fucking laptop.

i'll repeat it because i'm tired of guys like you and pp, with the main source of "info" and "knowledge" being braindead twitter shills: every "argument" for crypto is cringe low iq nonsense.

(01-03-2025, 08:40 PM)n9wiff Wrote: Mb bruv I didn't know

(01-03-2025, 08:36 PM)Altruist Wrote: no, it isn't. every "argument" for crypto is low iq nonsense, including this idiocy. 

i literally posted about a case of mine related to "bullet proof servers" and using crypto payments for anonymization/privacy purposes - national CERTs, the Interpol and the FBI easily tracked down every single retard buying those servers with bitcoin. the state attorney who is on the case, with the help of digital forensics experts, of course, even dug out posts of all those retards on darknet forums where they were communicating years ago. when i call these people retards, i mean retards compared to guys like me, not full blown retards - those were technologically literate people with serious net worth and sus intentions and origin

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54204356. this exact case, among other institutions that were hacked from those servers during that period. i have the indictment and the digitalized part of the entire case file (800+ pages) on this fucking laptop.

i'll repeat it because i'm tired of guys like you and pp, with the main source of "info" and "knowledge" being braindead twitter shills: every "argument" for crypto is cringe low iq nonsense.

(01-03-2025, 09:06 PM)kathisterima Wrote: that's what the governments and secret services want you to believe, that all your digital "wrongdoings" can be traced back at you, which is not necessarily true, and when people get caught it's mostly because of their own negligence

(01-03-2025, 09:43 PM)Altruist Wrote: so they randomly got to a specific group of individuals that somehow happened to admit they were behind the whole thing when testifying, with thousands of e-mails, messages and transactions accidentally all pointing to the fact that they were collaborating throughout years?

kill yourself, retard. the " that's what the governments and secret services want you to believe" formulation alone reeks of negative iq.

(01-03-2025, 09:46 PM)kathisterima Wrote: holy fucking cringe

you are arguing about a topic you dont have the first clue on, just shut the fuck up

(01-03-2025, 09:46 PM)kathisterima Wrote: holy fucking cringe

you are arguing about a topic you dont have the first clue on, just shut the fuck up

(01-03-2025, 09:56 PM)n9wiff Wrote: Well I believe that's what they call an "ad hominem" 

Get fucking owned.

(01-03-2025, 09:53 PM)Altruist Wrote: i'm literally talking about the topic where i have first-hand info, you fucking moron. and you are coming at me as some kind of an expert for both how secret services and court experts whose 1 hour of work costs 10k EUR operate while not even being capable of fixing a couple of bugs on a basic internet forum



again, good to know there are always neet incels online if you want legit info about any complex topic imaginable

(01-03-2025, 10:00 PM)Altruist Wrote: which ad hominem? the main post here is the long one where i described the entire specific situation, only to get "slapped" with "that's what (((they))) want you to believe" tier garbage

(01-03-2025, 09:58 PM)Altruist Wrote: if the government/"secret agencies" (just lol) are bluffing when trying to convince the gen pop that they can always catch you, how come they managed to get it perfectly right in the case i brought up? or are you saying them managing to identify 17/17 guys/LLCs/informal criminal groups and every click they've made between 2018 and 2022 down to a t is ... just a coincidence?