Lookism
We are more like mvp than we'd like to admit - Printable Version

+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: We are more like mvp than we'd like to admit (/showthread.php?tid=970)

Pages: 1 2


RE: We are more like mvp than we'd like to admit - MysteriousWeeb420 - 10-06-2022

(10-06-2022, 02:01 AM)unfathomably_unendurable Wrote:
(10-06-2022, 01:57 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(10-06-2022, 01:54 AM)unfathomably_unendurable Wrote:
(10-06-2022, 01:40 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: I don't trust your sequences any more

you've made 3 with mistakes

Huh 

just one miscalculation when i was half-drunk

either way ... the sum of squared digits minus the sum of digits

aren't you always half-drunk when you post, either way how am I supposed to know

it's been three times now

i am, but i only remember the 88-85 mistake

muh 145 iq lawayer with eidetic memory :soy:


RE: We are more like mvp than we'd like to admit - Altruist - 10-06-2022

144


RE: We are more like mvp than we'd like to admit - Altruist - 10-06-2022

i started sketching my general theory of law 2 weeks ago, btw

not sure if i m being overconfident or are those couple of authors grappling with it in my region just intellectually challenged, but i've already solved a quarter of "problems" in our positive law

this is like math for speds


RE: We are more like mvp than we'd like to admit - MysteriousWeeb420 - 10-06-2022

mirin

philosophy of law is interesting but I don't think I could ever study law because it seems so dry


RE: We are more like mvp than we'd like to admit - Altruist - 10-06-2022

(10-06-2022, 02:21 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: mirin

philosophy of law is interesting but I don't think I could ever study law because it seems so dry

it's not as philosophical, there's just an epistemological source in every claim

the dryness of it makes it appealing to me, i see it like math/physics, with the difference that it's intellectually accessible to me

- what's the source of legitimacy of legal norms
- nomotechnique + linguistics
- ranking of norms by power
- solving antinomies, voids and badly/ambiguously written rules
- lartpourlartesque standards for law-writing to make the process more uniform and interpretable (and even including computer programming/ai in the process of legislation updating)
- meticulously defining the roles of judges-district attorneys/private attorneys-the police-the parties-the public etc
- providing conceptual solutions for a million problems specialis arising in each of the 10-12 officially recognized branches of law (example: legal personality of a company)
- related issues with ethics and morality/economics/philosophy
+ much more

i'm filling like half a notebook per afternoon when working with my electronic devices off, just by deriving thoughts from my brain

dont really experience the same pleasure from any other activity