+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Suggestions (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: make pedotalk illegal (/showthread.php?tid=9520)
Pages:
1
2
RE: make pedotalk illegal - kathisterima - 02-11-2022
(02-11-2022, 03:04 PM)Fabulous Fabricator Wrote: I was addressing lunatical safety concerns you mentioned, not your personal feelings on it, you retarded son of an illiterate whore.
the irony is that so was I, but you are so arrogant you think you dealt with the safety argument because some soybots anecdotally ask about le child porn and no one cares about them, so I can only be talking about my moral stance on the matter when I say "I care about it". I guess we all know you are sub-70 IQ now, if that wasn't clear enough already.
RE: make pedotalk illegal - Fabulous Fabricator - 02-11-2022
(02-11-2022, 03:17 PM)kathisterima Wrote: hat so was I, but you are so arrogant you think you dealt with the safety argument because some soybots anecdotally ask about le child porn and no one cares about them, so I can only be talking about my moral stance on the matter when I say "I care abouThis genuinely seems like a draft where you put fitting words and throw them into a text to see if works.
Safety was addressed to bring you back to reality, as i'm in agreement with your moral stance here, and reality is that nobody cares about pedotalk on a shitty forum with 2 active users, as it's no different to edgy reddit requests.
Yet banning what you don't like violates the spirit of free speech, and the only arrogance of mine is expecting you to grasp that.
(02-11-2022, 03:17 PM)kathisterima Wrote: I guess we all know you are sub-70 IQ now, if that wasn't clear enough already.
Such fragile insult-attempts grow old quick, considering the ongoing idiocy of your own posts that are barely readable, moron.
RE: make pedotalk illegal - kathisterima - 02-11-2022
(02-11-2022, 03:44 PM)Fabulous Fabricator Wrote: This genuinely seems like a draft where you put fitting words and throw them into a text to see if works.
If you are trying to roast my response, the least you can do is make sense in your own response.
(02-11-2022, 03:44 PM)Fabulous Fabricator Wrote: Safety was addressed to bring you back to reality, as i'm in agreement with your moral stance here, and reality is that nobody cares about pedotalk on a shitty forum with 2 active users, as it's no different to edgy reddit requests.
It's different, in the sense that I'm not faceless like a rdm reddit user, and I'm more likely to be targeted. Either way, it's really none of your concern. If I care about safety, that's enough. It only affects me, so it's unreasonable of you to think you have a say this.
(02-11-2022, 03:44 PM)Fabulous Fabricator Wrote: Yet banning what you don't like violates the spirit of free speech, and the only arrogance of mine is expecting you to grasp that.
This is gonna break your heart but freedom of speech doesn't give you complete immunity to repercussions for what you said. It is common sense that posting child molestation propaganda is not acceptable anywhere, and here is no different. So stfu about muh freedom of speech.
(02-11-2022, 03:44 PM)Fabulous Fabricator Wrote: Such fragile insult-attempts grow old quick, considering the ongoing idiocy of your own posts that are barely readable, moron.
It's not an insult but rather a fitting epilogue to my post, that can help to swiftly summarize and deconstruct your own posts. I'm sorry that it blasted your ass and hurt your feelings.
RE: make pedotalk illegal - Fabulous Fabricator - 02-11-2022
(02-11-2022, 04:28 PM)kathisterima Wrote: erent, in the sense that I'm not faceless like a rdm reddit user, and I'm more likely to be targeted. Either way, it's really none of your concern. If I care about safety, that's enough. It only affects me, so it's unreasonable
I'm obviously not concerned by wellbeing of yours and your shitty forum, nor i'm trying to give an advice to make it better, merely catching someone that dumb to contradict oneself in a single post is entertaining enough.
(02-11-2022, 04:28 PM)kathisterima Wrote: It's not an insult but rather a fitting epilogue to my post, that can help to swiftly summarize and deconstruct your own posts. I'm sorry that it blasted your ass and hurt your feelings.
Deconstructing posts by making butthurted projections is a shitty way to do that to begin with, but i'm fine with you being my estrogenic barking dog.
RE: make pedotalk illegal - kathisterima - 02-11-2022
(02-11-2022, 05:26 PM)Fabulous Fabricator Wrote: I'm obviously not concerned by wellbeing of yours and your shitty forum, nor i'm trying to give an advice to make it better, merely catching someone that dumb to contradict oneself in a single post is entertaining enough.
Keep backtracking, loser.
(02-11-2022, 05:26 PM)Fabulous Fabricator Wrote: Deconstructing posts by making butthurted projections is a shitty way to do that to begin with, but i'm fine with you being my estrogenic barking dog.
oh, the irony
RE: make pedotalk illegal - Altruist - 03-11-2022
first
RE: make pedotalk illegal - psychoman - 04-11-2022
pedotalk is disgusting and it should be banned on everywhere not just here. i vote yes
RE: make pedotalk illegal - height - 08-11-2022
Pedos rule bookism