Quote:Sam Vaknin would likely see this as the tragic endpoint of accumulated trauma and a shattered false self, where relentless bullying exposed the boy's underlying fragility. He views bullying as a form of psychological attack that can turn normal adolescent narcissism into something malignant, fueling grandiosity, revenge fantasies, or total collapse when the child feels mocked, devalued, and isolated by peers and adults.

Vaknin stresses that parents bear primary responsibility for their child's mental health. Research like the ACE studies shows the home environment is the dominant factor shaping personality, resilience, and vulnerability. Sick, narcissistic, or "dead" parents destroy kids by breaching boundaries, preventing healthy separation-individuation, and leaving them without a stable true self—making them hypersensitive to external rejection like bullying over teeth or glasses. He bluntly says parents are "responsible for the mental health of their children," as they hold the key to activating genetic risks or protecting against them.

On the parents specifically, he'd argue they failed to equip their son with boundaries, reality-testing, or inner strength. If they were absent, overprotective, spoiling, or emotionally unavailable, they left him defenseless against the world. Even well-meaning parents can transmit trauma intergenerationally through poor attachment or isolation. In his view, the boy's suicide reflects not just school cruelty but a core emptiness from early home life that no amount of later intervention fully fixes. Schools and bullies share blame, but parents set the foundation. It's heartbreaking, and Vaknin would say this is exactly why he's childless—he refuses to risk inflicting that damage.

(11 hours ago)MVP Wrote: to go to school i was too aggressive

i instantly beat hostile pupils bloody

(11 hours ago)Dreckssau Wrote: Grok:

(10 hours ago)Busty Doll Wrote: Did you know that your favorite pop psychologist Sam Vanakin has a dubious degree