![]() |
|
clavicular really is zyzz 2.0 - Printable Version +- Lookism (https://bookism.net) +-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: clavicular really is zyzz 2.0 (/showthread.php?tid=49710) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: clavicular really is zyzz 2.0 - 69ixine - 06-05-2026 anyone that associates with the likes of andrew tate is not 'respectable'is a government psyop for sure. just make angsty teens obsessed with looks and more insecure theory so they become narcissus and never actually try to date but nitpick every flaw they have. just waste your best yrs on irrelevant shit theory. RE: clavicular really is zyzz 2.0 - alien sex - 06-05-2026 (05-05-2026, 08:41 PM)Ropium Wrote: Im litrally 63. I remember zyzz he was overrated af. Tiny ass fucking legs, no core, no back. Scooby1961, Jason blaha, jeff said, david laid etc were way more influential and could put up respectable weight. looks big to me RE: clavicular really is zyzz 2.0 - eldajaal1488 - 06-05-2026 (06-05-2026, 09:24 PM)69ixine Wrote: anyone that associates with the likes of andrew tate is not 'respectable'is a government psyop for sure.dont think its that deep tbh. he just said dumb shit and consistently enaugh to become popular over it, same with retard g if u have ,,confidence'' and do it over and over u should unironically be fine in long run |