(09-09-2025, 11:28 PM)mogs_me Wrote: one of my favorite movies tbh
revenge being portrayed in a semi-positive light isn’t common in many stories
acting was solid all around
entertaining action (there’s a funny way to work in “are you not entertained” line in response to OP but i’m too low iq)
score was solid as expected from zimmer

my only complaint is it hasn’t aged perfectly, some scenes are slightly corny and the plot plays out in a predictable manner

it won so many awards for a reason, but i guess you can’t like anything if it’s popular

(09-09-2025, 11:28 PM)mogs_me Wrote: one of my favorite movies tbh
revenge being portrayed in a semi-positive light isn’t common in many stories
acting was solid all around
entertaining action (there’s a funny way to work in “are you not entertained” line in response to OP but i’m too low iq)
score was solid as expected from zimmer

my only complaint is it hasn’t aged perfectly, some scenes are slightly corny and the plot plays out in a predictable manner

it won so many awards for a reason, but i guess you can’t like anything if it’s popular

(09-09-2025, 11:29 PM)machinelves Wrote: i think my pet only likes popular music and media tbh

(09-09-2025, 11:00 PM)Altruist Wrote: Opposing counsel

(10-09-2025, 08:50 PM)superiorpisspot234 Wrote: Did the romans really have legit pitch black west africans as slaves back then

1. Geographic Sources of Slaves
   • The Roman slave system was vast, pulling people from everywhere Rome had contact: Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
     
   • The most common sources of slaves were conquered regions in Europe and the Mediterranean.
     
   • However, Rome also had trade and military contact with Africa south of the Sahara, primarily through Nubia (modern Sudan) and connections further into the Sahel and West Africa via trans-Saharan routes.
     
2. Evidence of Sub-Saharan Africans in Rome
   • Roman art, mosaics, and literary sources clearly depict sub-Saharan Africans (“Aethiopians” in Roman/Greek terminology) with distinct features—dark skin, curly/kinky hair.
     
   • Such individuals could be found in Rome as slaves, entertainers, or even soldiers (auxiliaries from Nubia or allies).
     
3. Scale
   • Sub-Saharan Africans were a minority compared to the masses of European and Mediterranean slaves (Gauls, Thracians, Greeks, Syrians, etc.).
     
   • But their presence was notable enough that Romans had stereotypical views of “Aethiopians” as exotic peoples from the “edge of the world.”
     
4. West African Connection
   • Direct Roman presence in West Africa was minimal. Rome did not control territories beyond the Sahara.
     
   • But via trade routes through North Africa and the Sahara, it is possible that some enslaved West Africans (not just Nubians or East Africans) were transported north and ended up in Roman markets.
     
     

(10-09-2025, 08:55 PM)Busty Doll Wrote: but later I disovered Joaquin Phoenix was part Israeli and then I can no longer admire Caesar

(10-09-2025, 08:53 PM)Altruist Wrote: Yes, the Romans did encounter and enslave people with very dark—what you call “pitch black”—skin from Africa, though this was not the majority of their slave population.

Here are the key points:

1. Geographic Sources of Slaves
   • The Roman slave system was vast, pulling people from everywhere Rome had contact: Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
     
   • The most common sources of slaves were conquered regions in Europe and the Mediterranean.
     
   • However, Rome also had trade and military contact with Africa south of the Sahara, primarily through Nubia (modern Sudan) and connections further into the Sahel and West Africa via trans-Saharan routes.
     
2. Evidence of Sub-Saharan Africans in Rome
   • Roman art, mosaics, and literary sources clearly depict sub-Saharan Africans (“Aethiopians” in Roman/Greek terminology) with distinct features—dark skin, curly/kinky hair.
     
   • Such individuals could be found in Rome as slaves, entertainers, or even soldiers (auxiliaries from Nubia or allies).
     
3. Scale
   • Sub-Saharan Africans were a minority compared to the masses of European and Mediterranean slaves (Gauls, Thracians, Greeks, Syrians, etc.).
     
   • But their presence was notable enough that Romans had stereotypical views of “Aethiopians” as exotic peoples from the “edge of the world.”
     
4. West African Connection
   • Direct Roman presence in West Africa was minimal. Rome did not control territories beyond the Sahara.
     
   • But via trade routes through North Africa and the Sahara, it is possible that some enslaved West Africans (not just Nubians or East Africans) were transported north and ended up in Roman markets.
     
     

Conclusion:
Yes, there were legitimately very dark-skinned Africans, including some from West Africa, present in Roman slavery and society, though they were rare compared to other groups. Their presence is historically documented in art, literature, and archaeology.

Would you like me to give you specific Roman-era sources (textual and archaeological) that depict these Africans?

(10-09-2025, 09:01 PM)Altruist Wrote: how often do you have meaningful interactions with people in real life

(11-09-2025, 12:42 AM)PinkFatso Wrote: Any thoughts on the Dexter show?