![]() |
|
WWIII by 2026 - Printable Version +- Lookism (https://bookism.net) +-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: WWIII by 2026 (/showthread.php?tid=33245) |
RE: WWIII by 2026 - ΛΟΓΟΣ - 19-10-2025 RE: WWIII by 2026 - fdeshieldplus - 19-10-2025 no ww3, but i don't see the current conditions being sustainable beyond 2030 RE: WWIII by 2026 - friedrich_neet - 06-12-2025
RE: WWIII by 2026 - aklifaal - 06-12-2025 atomkrieg? ja bitte RE: WWIII by 2026 - Ebrius - 06-12-2025 2023 i said ww3 in 2024, 2024 i said ww3 in 2025, sadly nothing ever happens RE: WWIII by 2026 - friedrich_neet - 06-12-2025 (06-12-2025, 07:33 AM)aklifaal Wrote: atomkrieg? ja bitte i didnt try figuring out whether it will be nuclear or not, but in some military areas it could be RE: WWIII by 2026 - aklifaal - 06-12-2025 (06-12-2025, 07:44 AM)friedrich_neet Wrote: i didnt try figuring out whether it will be nuclear or not, but in some military areas it could be biochemical weapons / weaponized pathogens seems to be a much "cleaner" choice than thermonuclear ones RE: WWIII by 2026 - aklifaal - 06-12-2025 you just want to destroy your enemies manpower, not destroy their infrastructure, not even their equipment. thermonuclear option is the final one and i wouldn't reckon they would resort to that, like ever but yeah, expect drones operated by ai foe detection algorithm dropping munitions loaded with bubonic plague on you RE: WWIII by 2026 - friedrich_neet - 06-12-2025 (06-12-2025, 07:48 AM)aklifaal Wrote: biochemical weapons / weaponized pathogens seems to be a much "cleaner" choice than thermonuclear ones ure absolutely right honestly with modern tech it does not take much to fuck up some countries for good - letting thermonuclear war as smth like a last resort/backup like a delay of a peak targeting important areas for electricity, food production and so on and on - critical infrastructure - but now, bioweapons is next level and i think covid was the testing ground for that (which is very weird bc both the us and china were involved in it) RE: WWIII by 2026 - friedrich_neet - 06-12-2025 (06-12-2025, 07:51 AM)aklifaal Wrote: you just want to destroy your enemies manpower, not destroy their infrastructure, not even their equipment. thermonuclear option is the final one and i wouldn't reckon they would resort to that, like ever imagine dropping bioweapons on important fer-tile areas of food production of a country RE: WWIII by 2026 - aklifaal - 06-12-2025 (06-12-2025, 07:54 AM)friedrich_neet Wrote: i think covid was the testing ground for that (which is very weird bc both the us and china were involved in it) high iq. that was my thought as well. RE: WWIII by 2026 - Ebrius - 06-12-2025 (06-12-2025, 07:51 AM)aklifaal Wrote: you just want to destroy your enemies manpower, not destroy their infrastructure, not even their equipment. thermonuclear option is the final one and i wouldn't reckon they would resort to that, like ever lets create bunker in Siberia and wait for nuclear war then become the rulers of the world, we will kidnap hundreds of chicks and start our own civilization RE: WWIII by 2026 - aklifaal - 06-12-2025 (06-12-2025, 07:56 AM)Ebrius Wrote: lets create bunker in Siberia and wait for nuclear war then become the rulers of the world, we will kidnap hundreds of chicks and start our own civilization hell yeah boyo behold the apucalypse! ![]()
RE: WWIII by 2026 - friedrich_neet - 06-12-2025 does any of you remembers of deagels report where there is a massive pop drop of every country? RE: WWIII by 2026 - Ebrius - 06-12-2025 (06-12-2025, 08:01 AM)aklifaal Wrote: hell yeah boyo behold the apucalypse! we will have 0 internet or technology but we can write Bookism threads on paper |