[Looksmax]
Bad philosophers - Printable Version+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread:
[Looksmax]
Bad philosophers (/showthread.php?tid=27415)Pages:
1
2
RE: Bad philosophers - slop slinger - 20-09-2024
glissant
RE: Bad philosophers - Altruist - 20-09-2024
(19-09-2024, 02:50 PM)Honest Wrote: is it ironic that you give a "why" to justify your explanation?
anyway, this is reasonably common theme in philosophy. nietzsche mentions the evolutionary utility of language to attack our concepts of logic. wittgenstein also concerns himself with the utility of language and its inability to meaningfully address philosophical abstractions
Wittgenstein:
Nietzsche:
wittgenstein called his ramblings from the tractatus bullshit a couple of years later. still considered to be one of the greatest minds of the century. tells you everything you need to know about post-baconian philosophy
RE: Bad philosophers - Honest - 20-09-2024
(20-09-2024, 01:07 AM)Altruist Wrote: wittgenstein called his ramblings from the tractatus bullshit a couple of years later. still considered to be one of the greatest minds of the century. tells you everything you need to know about post-baconian philosophy
theres still continuity between tlp and pi. as far as i can tell, he continued to believe that most 'philosophical problems' were due to a misuse/misunderstanding of language
and "a couple of years later"? more like a couple of decades later
RE: Bad philosophers - Darkeningstar - 29-10-2025
Brutal
RE: Bad philosophers - Altruist - 29-10-2025
(19-09-2024, 03:30 AM)slop slinger Wrote: what's your take on nietzsche's philosophy of the relation of affect and representation
what's your take on Nietzsche's contribution to the hermeneutics of suspicion
In what ways do you think the Deleuzian generation of philosophers in France correctly and incorrectly intepreted Niezsche's theory of affect
In what ways if any do you think the relationship between lexis and logos in Nietzsche's early lectures on rhetoric inform his later theories of music in The Birth of Tragedy and beyond
To what extent do you think Nietzsche's understanding of voice in his lectures on rhetoric are original vs. an appropriation of Gustav Gerber's Die Sprache und das Erkennen
Actually forget all that. God isn't actually dead kek
RE: Bad philosophers - slop slinger - 29-10-2025
![[Image: 3ddc6752ef8794438a0eb411c84c4de7.gif]](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/3d/dc/67/3ddc6752ef8794438a0eb411c84c4de7.gif)
RE: Bad philosophers - Idec - 30-10-2025
And yet you still have to learn all of these peoples philosophies in philosophy class
RE: Bad philosophers - towncel - 31-10-2025
(30-10-2025, 08:58 AM)Idec Wrote: And yet you still have to learn all of these peoples philosophies in philosophy class
It's history of philosophy, it's not called that but it's fair. My grade is my grade.
RE: Bad philosophers - Darkeningstar - 31-10-2025
(20-09-2024, 01:07 AM)Altruist Wrote: wittgenstein called his ramblings from the tractatus bullshit a couple of years later. still considered to be one of the greatest minds of the century. tells you everything you need to know about post-baconian philosophy
Philosophical investigation, not that
It is not at all easy to assimilate knowledge from that book.
It is anti-midwit
RE: Bad philosophers - Altruist - 31-10-2025
(31-10-2025, 10:19 PM)Darkeningstar Wrote: Philosophical investigation, not that
It is not at all easy to assimilate knowledge from that book.
It is anti-midwit
3.1/10 posting style aspiration
RE: Bad philosophers - RenXuan88 - 31-10-2025
Luke Smith debunked Nietzsche
RE: Bad philosophers - towncel - 31-10-2025
(31-10-2025, 10:25 PM)RenXuan88 Wrote: Luke Smith debunked Nietzsche
When?