Lookism
damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - Printable Version

+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah (/showthread.php?tid=26852)

Pages: 1 2


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - slop slinger - 29-08-2024

(29-08-2024, 08:09 PM)eldajaal1488 Wrote: could u show me other examples of 3?
thats actually interesting

Kant's Faculties to name one, and the thousands of Kantians that came after


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - slop slinger - 29-08-2024

The only thing the Holy Trinity, The Three Pills, Kant's Faculties, Plato's Soul, Freud, and Lacan share here, is the number THREE. In this regard, let me note that I had three drinks today. Ergo I plagiarized Plato.


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - eldajaal1488 - 29-08-2024

(29-08-2024, 08:35 PM)HaughtyHotty Wrote: It's not that simple. Every emotion and every concept is all three at once. Freud's categories aren't buckets you throw different emotions and concepts into. The chart in OP is encouraging a rudimentary excel spreadsheet esque mode of thinking. For example, the second you feel a bodily intensity (Freud's id, Lacan's real) you immediately conceptualize it in your mind as an emotion and associate it with past events in which you have experienced a similar emotion (Freud's ego, Lacan's imaginary) and then the voice of conscience in  your head immediately compels you to respond to the emotion in a certain way and articulate it through language (Freud's superego, Lacan's symbolic). By the time the emotion, or any thought or concept or anything for that matter, makes itself available to conscious reflection it's already been overwritten by all three. Therefore no emotion "belongs" to any one category.
fuck u worded that pretty well
Clap
but dont think its always coming from body sensation, sometimes it can come from just raw pride.
ill give look to lacan for sure


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - eldajaal1488 - 29-08-2024

jfl what the actual fuck


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - slop slinger - 29-08-2024

(29-08-2024, 08:43 PM)eldajaal1488 Wrote: fuck u worded that pretty well
Clap
but dont think its always coming from body sensation, sometimes it can come from just raw pride.
ill give look to lacan for sure

All emotions come from pride?
But pride is also an emotion


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - eldajaal1488 - 29-08-2024

(29-08-2024, 08:43 PM)HaughtyHotty Wrote: The only thing the Holy Trinity, The Three Pills, Kant's Faculties, Plato's Soul, Freud, and Lacan share here, is the number THREE. In this regard, let me note that I had three drinks today. Ergo I plagiarized Plato.
other than holy trinity, they def share alot basics no?
animal, good boy and mental gymnast


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - eldajaal1488 - 29-08-2024

(29-08-2024, 08:46 PM)HaughtyHotty Wrote: All emotions come from pride?
But pride is also an emotion

no obviously unless ur narcy af jfl. but not all emotions come from id thats what im saying. some may start in ,,superego'' which then may end up as pride or shame(shame would come from id first yeah)


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - slop slinger - 29-08-2024

Plato was also an incel because he wanted to fuck prettyboys and milk them for philosophical inspiration but couldn't because he was old, ugly, and insufferable.


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - slop slinger - 29-08-2024

[Image: 901d46384530d7a9680673dc01c319f9e9161c57.gifv]


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - Bojack - 29-08-2024

All the great philosophers were inkwell man


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - Sexual chocolate - 29-08-2024

(29-08-2024, 06:39 PM)eldajaal1488 Wrote: sattva (goodness, calmness, harmonious), rajas (passion, activity, movement), and tamas (ignorance, inertia, laziness).
@n9wiff
ur brahmin badboy ancestors had their own version of this too

It's a distorted doctrine, it was used to describe abiogenesis and expound doctrine of purusha's interaction w prakriti in more systematic way. Tamas is more of inertness than laziness for eg. Shiva himself is described as inert a la perinde ac cadaver . It would male no sense to call him lazy when he's the mightiest of the Gods, prolly puranic nonsense to make these things palatable to the masses


RE: damn plato was silly inwel too, hes like me fr on allah - Sexual chocolate - 29-08-2024

(29-08-2024, 09:42 PM)HaughtyHotty Wrote: [Image: 901d46384530d7a9680673dc01c319f9e9161c57.gifv]

5 psl