Lookism
the bayesian interpretation of probability is so based - Printable Version

+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: the bayesian interpretation of probability is so based (/showthread.php?tid=1914)

Pages: 1 2

RE: the bayesian interpretation of probability is so based - Munificent - 09-05-2022

(09-05-2022, 02:51 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:49 AM)Munificent Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:44 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:32 AM)Munificent Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:29 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: essentially probabilities aren't real, they are just subjective interpretations of how likely an event is

isnt this self evident?

everything that happens has a 100% probability of happening, probability is just a tool we use to understand phenomena with our limited knowledge 

is there even any other 'interpretation' of probability other than bayesian?
you are being dogmatic. the true nature of randomness in the universe is not understood

yeah, classical, frequentist, propensity

yeah, i considered that. 

arent classical, frequentist etc just different ways to define probability, not what probability actually measures?
they are interpretations. ie wtf does a 50% chance mean

so bayesian interpretation is this: essentially probabilities aren't real, they are just subjective interpretations of how likely an event is

and somehow the other interpretations disagree with this?

RE: the bayesian interpretation of probability is so based - MysteriousWeeb420 - 09-05-2022

(09-05-2022, 02:55 AM)Munificent Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:51 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:49 AM)Munificent Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:44 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:32 AM)Munificent Wrote: isnt this self evident?

everything that happens has a 100% probability of happening, probability is just a tool we use to understand phenomena with our limited knowledge 

is there even any other 'interpretation' of probability other than bayesian?
you are being dogmatic. the true nature of randomness in the universe is not understood

yeah, classical, frequentist, propensity

yeah, i considered that. 

arent classical, frequentist etc just different ways to define probability, not what probability actually measures?
they are interpretations. ie wtf does a 50% chance mean

so bayesian interpretation is this: essentially probabilities aren't real, they are just subjective interpretations of how likely an event is

and somehow the other interpretations disagree with this?
yeah

RE: the bayesian interpretation of probability is so based - Munificent - 09-05-2022

(09-05-2022, 02:58 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:55 AM)Munificent Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:51 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:49 AM)Munificent Wrote:
(09-05-2022, 02:44 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: you are being dogmatic. the true nature of randomness in the universe is not understood

yeah, classical, frequentist, propensity

yeah, i considered that. 

arent classical, frequentist etc just different ways to define probability, not what probability actually measures?
they are interpretations. ie wtf does a 50% chance mean

so bayesian interpretation is this: essentially probabilities aren't real, they are just subjective interpretations of how likely an event is

and somehow the other interpretations disagree with this?
yeah

dont believe you