![]() |
|
what are your takes on classic psl arguments - Printable Version +- Lookism (https://bookism.net) +-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: what are your takes on classic psl arguments (/showthread.php?tid=1490) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - likeably ridiculous - 29-04-2022 (29-04-2022, 04:00 PM)WhalesAreBlue Wrote: Height doesn’t help that much i’m 6’7” Agreed, I’m 6’8 and with a 3 psl face it’s worthless RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - Ivan Fyodorovich - 29-04-2022 (29-04-2022, 08:46 PM)likeably ridiculous Wrote:(29-04-2022, 04:12 PM)Ivan Fyodorovich Wrote: status mogs all Genetics is the biggest role. There is much more to genetics than looks. There is more to status than looks as well. Jay-Z for example is ugly as fuck but no one could deny he has/had absolute dominant status and slayed in his prime. There is more to it than money aswell. Think about Musk vs Bezos. One high status one low status both extremely wealthy. A more extreme example of low L high M low S would be a guy like Paul Allen. Status captures some of the important aspects of L(genetics) and M(resources) but has more factors as well, that's why I would put it as most important. RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - kathisterima - 29-04-2022 I don't think about them. Whoever is right (I doubt someone is), it makes no difference. It's a senseless debate with no definite answer, you should believe whatever helps you cope and move along. RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - progeny - 30-04-2022 (29-04-2022, 11:45 PM)kathisterima Wrote: I don't think about them. Whoever is right (I doubt someone is), it makes no difference. It's a senseless debate with no definite answer, you should believe whatever helps you cope and move along. holy shit youre so dismissive and above everyone else! why cant i be this cool RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - Bvnny - 30-04-2022 Face > Height RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - sin - 30-04-2022 skull>height skull=frame frame>face aura>iq sentience=height RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - likeably ridiculous - 30-04-2022 (29-04-2022, 11:31 PM)Ivan Fyodorovich Wrote:(29-04-2022, 08:46 PM)likeably ridiculous Wrote:(29-04-2022, 04:12 PM)Ivan Fyodorovich Wrote: status mogs all Imagine bezos looked like musk and musk looked like bezos. Would musk still have the edge concerning status? I’m not so sure And even high status guys like Mike Tyson get cucked by guys like Brad Pitt RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - B00X - 31-03-2026 (30-04-2022, 02:50 AM)Bvnny Wrote: Face > Height RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - Ropium - 31-03-2026 Almost all of them have merit. But copers pretend theyre debunked because they manage to find some one a.milloon oofy exception RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - tehnoslav - 31-03-2026 (29-04-2022, 07:21 PM)TallGlassofMilk Wrote: Jfl this kid is deformed RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - Ropium - 31-03-2026 There is a reason he's a homeless druggy begging.for change.on the street. Same ugly kid with a frown and a downer attitude would get ripped apart by the "omg how is he homeless I would let him stay with me" virtue signallers RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - Ropium - 31-03-2026 Normies love seeing the lower rungs.of.society content with their place in the hierarchy. It's comforting knowing they're not agitating for xhange RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - alien sex - 31-03-2026 does nt matter?
RE: what are your takes on classic psl arguments - machinelves - 31-03-2026 nt |