Lookism
[Rate]
PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Printable Version

+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread:
[Rate]
PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. (/showthread.php?tid=13273)

Pages: 1 2

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - 10khitman - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 10:15 AM)Repsel1001 Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 09:34 AM)10khitman Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 09:18 AM)Repsel1001 Wrote: Both are underage.

Please stop rating children.

Those are adequately developed females.

Homie both are under 18

Humans used to live until like 20, add to that the fact that jews are pumping estrogen into the water supply, 17 is a developped female.


Highest birth survival rate is even younger, not that im making a case for having sex with 13 year olds, but, the idea that the arbitrary age of 18 is some marker for "developed" or "underdeveloped" is completely and utterly retarded. Legally, sure, theres a reason, but morally or ethnically its not a thing.

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Repsel1001 - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 10:18 AM)10khitman Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 10:15 AM)Repsel1001 Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 09:34 AM)10khitman Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 09:18 AM)Repsel1001 Wrote: Both are underage.

Please stop rating children.

Those are adequately developed females.

Homie both are under 18

Humans used to live until like 20, add to that the fact that jews are pumping estrogen into the water supply, 17 is a developped female.


Highest birth survival rate is even younger, not that im making a case for having sex with 13 year olds, but, the idea that the arbitrary age of 18 is some marker for "developed" or "underdeveloped" is completely and utterly retarded. Legally, sure, theres a reason, but morally or ethnically its not a thing.

Well can =/= should.

This is just peversion and downright pedophilia.

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - 10khitman - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 10:24 AM)Repsel1001 Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 10:18 AM)10khitman Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 10:15 AM)Repsel1001 Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 09:34 AM)10khitman Wrote: Those are adequately developed females.

Homie both are under 18

Humans used to live until like 20, add to that the fact that jews are pumping estrogen into the water supply, 17 is a developped female.


Highest birth survival rate is even younger, not that im making a case for having sex with 13 year olds, but, the idea that the arbitrary age of 18 is some marker for "developed" or "underdeveloped" is completely and utterly retarded. Legally, sure, theres a reason, but morally or ethnically its not a thing.

Well can =/= should.

This is just peversion and downright pedophilia.

Lol, if you look at those pictures, and call that pedophilia, then theres no point in having this conversation.


Anyways, theres a way to analyze looks by assessing their facial structure, doesnt have to be sexual. But I will not condemn attraction to them either; most normal thing ever.

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - brocode - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 09:47 AM)10khitman Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 04:55 AM)Archimedes Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 04:52 AM)brocode Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 04:49 AM)Archimedes Wrote: second fogs. pretty sure her lips are fake, but whatever

they arent

i thoroughly checked

she is just excessively pouting them

I see. yeah, second def fogs the first, OP

Look giga there, but she is frauding, look at her in motion. She is quite dark and looks low class in reality:


she doesnt have that youth appeal but she fogs the first one imo
not good lighting etc

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Altruist - 22-02-2023

2, i m not sexually attracted to children

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - kathisterima - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 07:10 PM)contributing_autist Wrote: 2, i m not sexually attracted to children

"Unless she's been fucked by 100 other dudes, I'm not into her."

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Altruist - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 07:14 PM)kathisterima Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 07:10 PM)contributing_autist Wrote: 2, i m not sexually attracted to children

"Unless she's been fucked by 100 other dudes, I'm not into her."

Most girls never even get to two digits

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - dat feel - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 07:14 PM)kathisterima Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 07:10 PM)contributing_autist Wrote: 2, i m not sexually attracted to children

"Unless she's been fucked by 100 other dudes, I'm not into her."

Cage

(22-02-2023, 07:42 PM)contributing_autist Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 07:14 PM)kathisterima Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 07:10 PM)contributing_autist Wrote: 2, i m not sexually attracted to children

"Unless she's been fucked by 100 other dudes, I'm not into her."

Most girls get to two digits before hs

fixed

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Archimedes - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 09:47 AM)10khitman Wrote: Look giga there, but she is frauding, look at her in motion. She is quite dark and looks low class in reality:

if you see her stories, there's variance in her complexion, the reason may be that she tans too much. full of beach stories on her IG