(30-04-2022, 12:47 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:41 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:38 AM)bookie Wrote:

(25-04-2022, 07:21 PM)bookmaker Wrote: another day, another butthurt AOC cuck. imagine making an account because of this

why do these sites attract so many racists/antisemites, pedos, homophobes, neets, gore watchers and all the other human trash to this extent? are these topics so closely related to "looksmaxing" discussions? i don't think so

I'll ask again, why is being a homophobe a bad thing? Why is it bad to say adults fucking high schoolers is okay, but gays fucking each other is bad?

You act like this is plain truth. You are pretty fucking brainwashed.

it's pretty simple really. homosexual men and women can consent but young teenagers are still developing mentally so they are in a position to be taken advantage of

teenagers can consent.

also anyone can be taken advantage of.

your arguments are feminist in nature

(30-04-2022, 12:53 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:47 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:41 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:38 AM)bookie Wrote:

(25-04-2022, 07:21 PM)bookmaker Wrote: another day, another butthurt AOC cuck. imagine making an account because of this

why do these sites attract so many racists/antisemites, pedos, homophobes, neets, gore watchers and all the other human trash to this extent? are these topics so closely related to "looksmaxing" discussions? i don't think so

I'll ask again, why is being a homophobe a bad thing? Why is it bad to say adults fucking high schoolers is okay, but gays fucking each other is bad?

You act like this is plain truth. You are pretty fucking brainwashed.

it's pretty simple really. homosexual men and women can consent but young teenagers are still developing mentally so they are in a position to be taken advantage of

teenagers can consent.

also anyone can be taken advantage of.

your arguments are feminist in nature

let me ask you something. is it easier to manipulate an adult or a teenager?

we are trying to minimise suffering and maximise wellbeing here

the best way to do this is to draw a line where below it lots of suffering would occur and above it not so much

(30-04-2022, 12:53 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:47 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:41 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:38 AM)bookie Wrote:

(25-04-2022, 07:21 PM)bookmaker Wrote: another day, another butthurt AOC cuck. imagine making an account because of this

why do these sites attract so many racists/antisemites, pedos, homophobes, neets, gore watchers and all the other human trash to this extent? are these topics so closely related to "looksmaxing" discussions? i don't think so

I'll ask again, why is being a homophobe a bad thing? Why is it bad to say adults fucking high schoolers is okay, but gays fucking each other is bad?

You act like this is plain truth. You are pretty fucking brainwashed.

it's pretty simple really. homosexual men and women can consent but young teenagers are still developing mentally so they are in a position to be taken advantage of

teenagers can consent.

also anyone can be taken advantage of.

your arguments are feminist in nature

let me ask you something. is it easier to manipulate an adult or a teenager?

we are trying to minimise suffering and maximise wellbeing here

the best way to do this is to draw a line where below it lots of abuse would occur and above it not so much

(30-04-2022, 12:56 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:53 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:47 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:41 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 12:38 AM)bookie Wrote: I'll ask again, why is being a homophobe a bad thing? Why is it bad to say adults fucking high schoolers is okay, but gays fucking each other is bad?

You act like this is plain truth. You are pretty fucking brainwashed.

it's pretty simple really. homosexual men and women can consent but young teenagers are still developing mentally so they are in a position to be taken advantage of

teenagers can consent.

also anyone can be taken advantage of.

your arguments are feminist in nature

let me ask you something. is it easier to manipulate an adult or a teenager?

we are trying to minimise suffering and maximise wellbeing here

the best way to do this is to draw a line where below it lots of suffering would occur and above it not so much

I would argue more suffering occurs in modern times where divorce rates are high than in the past when girls got married shortly after puberty.

On top of that, are there studies showing harm in areas that have an AoC of 14? I doubt it.

(30-04-2022, 01:05 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: no because before they would have to suffer through shit marriages and abuse 

age 6-16 study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693773/

(30-04-2022, 01:11 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:05 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: no because before they would have to suffer through shit marriages and abuse 

age 6-16 study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693773/

Age 6-16? 
That's not a wide range at all bud.

(30-04-2022, 01:12 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:11 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:05 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: no because before they would have to suffer through shit marriages and abuse 

age 6-16 study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693773/

Age 6-16? 
That's not a wide range at all bud.

cope, you just got rekt lol

(30-04-2022, 01:13 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:12 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:11 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:05 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: no because before they would have to suffer through shit marriages and abuse 

age 6-16 study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693773/

Age 6-16? 
That's not a wide range at all bud.

cope, you just got rekt lol

No, I didn't, you're crowng yourself for using a study that is flawed compared to the question because it focuses on abusive sex, not non abusive sex.

(30-04-2022, 01:14 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:13 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:12 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:11 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:05 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: no because before they would have to suffer through shit marriages and abuse 

age 6-16 study

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693773/

Age 6-16? 
That's not a wide range at all bud.

cope, you just got rekt lol

No, I didn't, you're crowng yourself for using a study that is flawed compared to the question because it focuses on abusive sex, not non abusive sex.

what sex with minors isn't abusive?

in before you cope with like the 0.1% of teenagers just below the aoc

(30-04-2022, 01:17 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:14 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:13 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:12 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:11 AM)bookie Wrote: Age 6-16? 
That's not a wide range at all bud.

cope, you just got rekt lol

No, I didn't, you're crowng yourself for using a study that is flawed compared to the question because it focuses on abusive sex, not non abusive sex.

what sex with minors isn't abusive?

in before you cope with like the 0.1% of teenagers just below the aoc

AoC varies.

For example if AoC is 18 in one area, does that mean 99.9% of consensual sex with 16-17 year olds is abusive?

(30-04-2022, 01:22 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:17 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:14 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:13 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:12 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: cope, you just got rekt lol

No, I didn't, you're crowng yourself for using a study that is flawed compared to the question because it focuses on abusive sex, not non abusive sex.

what sex with minors isn't abusive?

in before you cope with like the 0.1% of teenagers just below the aoc

AoC varies.

For example if AoC is 18 in one area, does that mean 99.9% of consensual sex with 16-17 year olds is abusive?

yeah laws vary 

ideal age of consent is around 16

(30-04-2022, 01:24 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:22 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:17 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:14 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:13 AM)bookie Wrote: No, I didn't, you're crowng yourself for using a study that is flawed compared to the question because it focuses on abusive sex, not non abusive sex.

what sex with minors isn't abusive?

in before you cope with like the 0.1% of teenagers just below the aoc

AoC varies.

For example if AoC is 18 in one area, does that mean 99.9% of consensual sex with 16-17 year olds is abusive?

yeah laws vary 

ideal age of consent is around 16

Argumentum ad populum fallacy.

So if AoC is 16 in one country, does that now mean 99.9% percent of consensual sex in a country where AoC is 14 is abusive?

(30-04-2022, 01:25 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:24 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:22 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:17 AM)bookie Wrote:

(30-04-2022, 01:14 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: what sex with minors isn't abusive?

in before you cope with like the 0.1% of teenagers just below the aoc

AoC varies.

For example if AoC is 18 in one area, does that mean 99.9% of consensual sex with 16-17 year olds is abusive?

yeah laws vary 

ideal age of consent is around 16

Argumentum ad populum fallacy.

So if AoC is 16 in one country, does that now mean 99.9% percent of consensual sex in a country where AoC is 14 is abusive?

when did I reference popularity?

yeah I think 14 is definitely too low. more bad than good comes from that

(25-04-2022, 02:42 PM)bookie Wrote:

(25-04-2022, 02:39 PM)God Wrote: You can’t fuck high schoolers unless you are a high schooler yourself

Wrong, AoC in Europe is 14-15 in most places. Meaning they can consent with anyone older no matter the age gap.