![]() |
|
there must be a scientific explanation for this - Printable Version +- Lookism (https://bookism.net) +-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: there must be a scientific explanation for this (/showthread.php?tid=577) Pages:
1
2
|
there must be a scientific explanation for this - Altruist - 16-04-2022 I have 60 printed laws in my room, so I went for the one I need to check now guess how many prints did I count and guess which one is missing spent half an hour for nothing reminds me of the one lost sock thing RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - RetrudedMaxilla - 16-04-2022 you counted fifty nine prints and one was missing? RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - Altruist - 16-04-2022 (16-04-2022, 11:46 PM)RetrudedMaxilla Wrote: you counted fifty nine prints and one was missing? yeah, exactly the one I need I mean I can print it again, but it's so infuriating RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - RetrudedMaxilla - 17-04-2022 (16-04-2022, 11:47 PM)antagonizing_autist Wrote:my condolences(16-04-2022, 11:46 PM)RetrudedMaxilla Wrote: you counted fifty nine prints and one was missing? when this happens to me (except it's usually a managa not a fancy law textbook) i just use Manga TX. but i guess that won't work in your case RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - Altruist - 17-04-2022 (17-04-2022, 12:03 AM)RetrudedMaxilla Wrote:(16-04-2022, 11:47 PM)antagonizing_autist Wrote:my condolences(16-04-2022, 11:46 PM)RetrudedMaxilla Wrote: you counted fifty nine prints and one was missing? i mean it's not a real problem, it's all available online, but these situations always baffle me. why couldnt that document be second in line on the stack? jfl RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - RetrudedMaxilla - 17-04-2022 (17-04-2022, 12:04 AM)antagonizing_autist Wrote:(17-04-2022, 12:03 AM)RetrudedMaxilla Wrote:(16-04-2022, 11:47 PM)antagonizing_autist Wrote:my condolences(16-04-2022, 11:46 PM)RetrudedMaxilla Wrote: you counted fifty nine prints and one was missing? hmmm then in that case idk http://www.jenniferlinnig.com/wordpress/2013/09/reasons-we-lose-things/ RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - kathisterima - 17-04-2022 I suppose being a bit of careless is not a bad thing. RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - Altruist - 17-04-2022 (17-04-2022, 12:31 AM)kathisterima Wrote: I suppose being a bit of careless is not a bad thing. i m extremely tidy and organized, one more reason for this to piss me off RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - MysteriousWeeb420 - 17-04-2022 It's called confirmation bias If it was second in stack you wouldn't acknowledge it as noteworthy event RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - Altruist - 17-04-2022 you are so smart, thanks for opening my eyes RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - MysteriousWeeb420 - 17-04-2022 You're mocking me but it's the truth lol at thinking you are somehow immune to common evolutionary encoded biases RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - Honest - 17-04-2022 I’m guessing this is josh lol RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - Mr Looks - 17-04-2022 take care of your paper boy RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - Altruist - 17-04-2022 (17-04-2022, 10:06 AM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote: You're mocking me but it's the truth yeah, i m totally not aware of this one, lol your negs speak for themselves. enjoy the taste of your own medicine, permavirgin RE: there must be a scientific explanation for this - dwohhgang - 17-04-2022 oh my god what happend to my pet |