![]() |
|
we never have deep conversations anymore - Printable Version +- Lookism (https://bookism.net) +-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: we never have deep conversations anymore (/showthread.php?tid=20586) Pages:
1
2
|
we never have deep conversations anymore - MysteriousWeeb420 - 11-02-2024 it's all superficial posturing
RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - Altruist - 11-02-2024 ![]() totally not identical to the rhetoric of forum alphas from certain forums who also have perpetual rage against redditors, ironically, as a part of their repertoire
RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - Altruist - 11-02-2024 not really related to the thread, but when i read the title, i instinctively googled "reddit neckbeard meme" and decided to post this one here RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - MysteriousWeeb420 - 11-02-2024 (11-02-2024, 02:00 PM)Michelangelo Wrote:considering lucidity and maturity of the mind is central to consent, soyjak is making a good point here RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - kathisterima - 11-02-2024 It's because I'm not making high effort threads anymore. It's no secret that I'm the energy bundle responsible for all the highs and lows this site goes through. RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - Altruist - 11-02-2024 (11-02-2024, 02:03 PM)MysteriousWeeb420 Wrote:(11-02-2024, 02:00 PM)Michelangelo Wrote:considering lucidity and maturity of the mind is central to consent, soyjak is making a good point here yes. this is not nearly as moronic as groaning in agony because there are girls with visible tits who are still below the aoc ![]() and that's without factoring in that those repulsive social rejects would never be able to get "consent" from those girls anyway, since they're advocating for lowering the age of consent, not completely removing the concept of consent from the law ![]() jesus fucking christ, i've spent the second-best years of my life chatting with anonymous weirdos that barely qualify as lifeforms RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - Honest - 11-02-2024 Is this my pet's attempt at having a "deep conversation"?... RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - Altruist - 11-02-2024 digressions aside, who are you gonna have them with? how many remotely active posters possess at least some knowledge, are interested in the topics you have in mind and are capable of providing any substantial input? kath - ok in all 3 categories 666 - great as far as perceptive and writing skills go, but doesnt care about the discussions you are aiming at at all josh and rm - seem to be around all the time, but they are only showing up sporadically slop - elite in all categories and probably the most educated poster after me, but has the la langue pour la langue problem, causing him to slop into pointless linguistic masturbation too easily honest - good, but too much of an abused dog after all those years spent as the weird, unpopular kid, so it's a matter of minutes before he shifts the conversation towards that insipid normie-bashing you can hear in 99% of conversations of textbook "normalfags" outside, just without them using the specific psl lingo lana - doesnt lack the wit and verbal iq, but not particularly educated and interested in the boring stuff you have in mind; also suffers from the slop syndrome to a large extent munificent - great wit, but doesnt post enough i surely forgot a lot of people and cant be bothered to exhaustively list everyone, but the rest have "evolution is a hoax"/"covid is a hoax"/"women are inherently evil"/"FOR GOD'S SAKE, BEING ATTRACTED TO 15 YO GIRLS DOESNT MAKE ME A PEDOPHILE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!STOP RUINING MY LIFE WITH YOUR MORAL PANIC!!!!!"/"I didn't eat anything for 5 days and I'm hungry, the jews are at it again" as their intellectual peak RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - bluerose - 12-02-2024 (11-02-2024, 06:51 PM)Michelangelo Wrote: digressions aside, who are you gonna have them with? how many remotely active posters possess at least some knowledge, are interested in the topics you have in mind and are capable of providing any substantial input? slop and lana love letter RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - Altruist - 12-02-2024 (11-02-2024, 04:57 PM)Honest Wrote: Is this my pet's attempt at having a "deep conversation"?... i couldnt have made it clearer what the nature of my post was, you fucking retard here it is again, in font 7: Quote:not really related to the thread, but when i read the title, i instinctively googled "reddit neckbeard meme" and decided to post this one here bonus clarification 2 posts later, for fucking retards like yourself: Quote:digressions aside and if you couldnt tell from my previous 500 posts made on psl about this topic how brutally cringe and trigger-worthy i find the topic i introduced to this thread knowing it would stay at 0 replies otherwise, you being a fucking retard is the explanation --- feel free to propose the topic of a "deep conversation" in a new thread and i'll gladly engage. just bear in mind "hurrdurr, normies are stupid and shallow, whereas i am a special fucking snowflake because i'm a fat ugly virgin with 0 skills, status, money, qualifications and virtues that exist outside of my deluded mind too" doesn't qualify as a deep topic we both know how this ended the last time, on lookism, though - with: 1. you making a thread where you tried to convince the forum you are smarter than me only to end up getting brutally ridiculed by everyone, while, bizarrely ironically, unconsciously trying to mimic my arguing techniques in the same posts where you tried to dismantle my claims (if it's even needed to emphasize, it was not because you were being sarcastic, your entire behavior was flying over your head while other started picking up on it and caging at you as well), followed by 2. you starting over on a new alt (you literally stopped logging in on magnifique and made some new equally sad accounts, honest being the one that stuck), and brutally ended by 3. you making a thread months later (yes, the failure from 1. caused you that much suffering and shame) where you tried to convince people it was me who made that thread from a cloned alt, and that you had nothing to do with it
RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - Altruist - 12-02-2024 ^ needless to say, you've made the thread mentioned under 1. after a period where i relentlessly bullied you and exposed your inflated ego and delusions about being any more special, deeper or smarter than the average drooling retard roaming the streets, so you genuinely believed you could put an end to that by just openly calling yourself actually smarter than me ![]() but yes, talking about, literally, worn-out reddit MEMES and cringing at ugly incels crying for jbs for the billionth time in my forum career is "my attempt at starting a deep conversation". i've totally never made hundreds of actually serious threads about social phenomena, science, academia, social dynamics and other less banal topics before, it must be exactly this how i imagine a deep conversation ![]() i mean, it's not that you would remember, you only engage in anything deeper than posting emo music videos if it's about a crime committed by a nigger or a "normie" from twitter posting something cringe; otherwise, you are nowhere to be seen in those threads for obvious reasons p.s. since i know you won't get that either without me drawing it to you: the first post i've reposted in font 7 in response to you contained a cheap, low-effort, worn-out ironic jab, the type of jabs i'm regularly throwing at the op, which is pretty much the textbook definition of a shitpost RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - bluerose - 12-02-2024 (11-02-2024, 02:00 PM)Michelangelo Wrote: my pet dosen't get dis meme completely, either: it's about how men nowadays think life is all about getting cunny and marrying it (see waifu meme), when in nature they would have spent the majority of their lives bonding with high trust male best friends, hence this modern age where natural masculinity is dead producing weird consumerist fusions to buy and fall in love with, like high sentience anime lolitas or manic pixie dream girls (look it up). a mix between cunny (which is a meme that to a big extent results from socially repressed homosexual lust for early sexual stage boy on boy bonding or later stage mentor and student bonding) and the best friend they never got and who, realistically, doesn't exist cuz men nowadays are ridiculously low quality. my pet just gets slop and me, which is natural, not artificial starggot-consoomer, androgyny, aka something that evolved cuz even in the evolutionary past of our species incels existed, so someone like slop is like dat blond blue eyed anime nazi girl, genius homo-genes to tame dangerous masculinity so it doesn't attack women or children somewhere down the line.
RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - Altruist - 12-02-2024 (12-02-2024, 06:55 PM)bluerose Wrote:(11-02-2024, 02:00 PM)Michelangelo Wrote: me referring to that meme had nothing to do with "waifus", "lolitas" and other stuff you posted here, nor was that an actually serious attempt at drawing analogies between those 2 groups of sex-starved internet dwelling social rejects. i was simply cynically clowning the multifaceted delusions braindead coping incels on these forums have regarding the age of consent, none of which (braindead coping incels) are anywhere close to even beginning to understand, on any level of consciousness, what you wrote here. we are talking about guys who think "op is indian" posts are peak humor without any ironic reserves RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - Honest - 12-02-2024 Still trying to figure out if my pet is trying to have a deep conversation RE: we never have deep conversations anymore - bluerose - 12-02-2024 (12-02-2024, 07:20 PM)Honest Wrote: Still trying to figure out if my pet is trying to have a deep conversation reply to my post, since it tied my pet's ramblings together. |