Lookism
[Rate]
PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Printable Version

+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread:
[Rate]
PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. (/showthread.php?tid=13273)

Pages: 1 2

PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - 10khitman - 22-02-2023

The entire fate of the looks theory lies in this study. A certain ratio MUST BE REACHED or LOOKS THEORY is DEBUNKED.

This thread is NOT for the worship of either of these women, it is an OBJECTIVE STUDY on which the ENTIRE BALANCE OF LOOKS THEORY LIES.

WHO FOGS

Female 1:

https://www.tiktok.com/@addieisdaddyyy/video/7200211711423728942

Female 2:


[Image: attachment.php?aid=816]

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Born2Mog - 22-02-2023

i can se an arguement for #2 based on face alone, but #1 has bitchy/sassy vibe (want to rape her) and large breasts

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Archimedes - 22-02-2023

second fogs. pretty sure her lips are fake, but whatever

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - brocode - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 04:49 AM)Archimedes Wrote: second fogs. pretty sure her lips are fake, but whatever

they arent

i thoroughly checked

she is just excessively pouting them



RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Archimedes - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 04:52 AM)brocode Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 04:49 AM)Archimedes Wrote: second fogs. pretty sure her lips are fake, but whatever

they arent

i thoroughly checked

she is just excessively pouting them

I see. yeah, second def fogs the first, OP



RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - hurt - 22-02-2023

i like the 2nd one

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Masculine Bad Boy - 22-02-2023

first is younger and has a more white surname

me and @dat feel pick the first one

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - dat feel - 22-02-2023

it's easy to be fooled by their makeup but both would be about 6/10 in the 1950s

first one fogs because she's more of a classic beauty, good facial structure and she has jb glow

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - 10khitman - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 08:43 AM)dat feel Wrote: it's easy to be fooled by their makeup but both would be about 6/10 in the 1950s

first one fogs because she's more of a classic beauty, good facial structure and she has jb glow

Could you please put your vote? :)


And I agree, but first one I seen without makeup, she still looks decent

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - dat feel - 22-02-2023

it's an unfair comparison because the second one looks older so she's never gonna fog

difference in looks in the 18-23 range is huge even if the difference is just a year or two

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Repsel1001 - 22-02-2023

Both are underage.

Please stop rating children.

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - 10khitman - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 09:02 AM)dat feel Wrote: it's an unfair comparison because the second one looks older so she's never gonna fog

difference in looks in the 18-23 range is huge even if the difference is just a year or two

This is true. But, I posted the younger one, and someone posted the older one and said she fogs. I found this blasphemous, and it made me question looks theory cause I thought theres no way u can think 2 fogs, so I made this poll with the exact pictures in question.

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - 10khitman - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 09:18 AM)Repsel1001 Wrote: Both are underage.

Please stop rating children.

Those are adequately developed females.

RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - 10khitman - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 04:55 AM)Archimedes Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 04:52 AM)brocode Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 04:49 AM)Archimedes Wrote: second fogs. pretty sure her lips are fake, but whatever

they arent

i thoroughly checked

she is just excessively pouting them

I see. yeah, second def fogs the first, OP

Look giga there, but she is frauding, look at her in motion. She is quite dark and looks low class in reality:



RE: PLEASE PARTICIPATE: Highly Imperative LOOKS THEORY Study. - Repsel1001 - 22-02-2023

(22-02-2023, 09:34 AM)10khitman Wrote:
(22-02-2023, 09:18 AM)Repsel1001 Wrote: Both are underage.

Please stop rating children.

Those are adequately developed females.

Homie both are under 18