+- Lookism (https://bookism.net)
+-- Forum: Lookism Forums (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Shitty Advice (https://bookism.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis (/showthread.php?tid=13124)
Pages:
1
2
early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - Archimedes - 15-02-2023
all of that neo-Darwinian and EvoPysch nonsense only to be refuted by TikTok pretty/fem boys
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - eldajaal1488 - 15-02-2023
evopsych is what happend in past jfl. it has no data for current meta, if world collapsed it would become legit again.
obviously depends location to location in the end
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - eldajaal1488 - 15-02-2023
Freud contrasted the pleasure principle with the counterpart concept of the reality principle, which describes the capacity to defer gratification of a desire when circumstantial reality disallows its immediate gratification. In infancy and early childhood, the id rules behavior by obeying only the pleasure principle. People at that age only seek immediate gratification, aiming to satisfy cravings such as hunger and thirst, and at later ages the id seeks out sex.
Maturity is learning to endure the pain of deferred gratification. Freud argued that "an ego thus educated has become 'reasonable'; it no longer lets itself be governed by the pleasure principle, but obeys the reality principle, which also, at bottom, seeks to obtain pleasure, but pleasure which is assured through taking account of reality, even though it is pleasure postponed and diminished
tfw mogged by kike century ago
actually insane i felt like i cracked code back then on lookism, yet most likely even this dude wasnt first to pick up pattern. mogs me to self harm tho my rambles were 1/5 as good tops, and very scuffed, missing nice amount
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - Archimedes - 15-02-2023
(15-02-2023, 10:25 AM)eldajaal1488 Wrote: evopsych is what happend in past jfl. it has no data for current meta, if world collapsed it would become legit again.
obviously depends location to location in the end
it's what supposedly 'happened' in the past and its imprints to our current World
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - eldajaal1488 - 15-02-2023
(15-02-2023, 10:32 AM)Archimedes Wrote:i dont think peoples perception would be much different towards pleasing things not in just sexual way, just had other problems where pleasure is unaffordable. we are probably for first time afforded relatively safe pleasure, with survival not being first priority. this is where redpill fails in such envirovment, but in rough one it would help alot to have money/status etc. its good for safety and it would sell, but whats point if its not so important in your meta, and basically granted(15-02-2023, 10:25 AM)eldajaal1488 Wrote: evopsych is what happend in past jfl. it has no data for current meta, if world collapsed it would become legit again.
obviously depends location to location in the end
it's what supposedly 'happened' in the past and its imprints to our current World
in less civilized time status+money would be strength+craftiness for weapons i guess
evopsych+tate and co arent exactly wrong, just obsolete in some parts of world.
its chad fuxx joe buxx world i guess
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - Archimedes - 15-02-2023
masculinity does weigh its importance on functional utility, sure. however, I don't see how those theories are important to attraction. if it does not stand the test of time, let alone predict what's going to happen in this time-wheel, then I do not see any validity. 'standing the test of time' is the only reason 'truth' is worthy
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - eldajaal1488 - 15-02-2023
(15-02-2023, 10:56 AM)Archimedes Wrote: masculinity does weigh its importance on functional utility, sure. however, I don't see how those theories are important to attraction. if it does not stand the test of time, let alone predict what's going to happen in this time-wheel, then I do not see any validity. 'standing the test of time' is the only reason 'truth' is worthyif pleasure is affordable, utility doesnt matter(its already there by default)so you better be chad. if utility is needed, pleasure chasing is repressed, and you can trade over utility for pussy.
when u think about it feminism is basically proxy to milk utility without giving pussy back, just as redpill is trying to get w*men in kitchen+not give out shit for free. other tricks you can observe are probably cockblocking inbetween males(muh dominance), and talking shit behind each others back between women (to make other girls non ltr worthy for chad
)give or take freuds schizo ramblings stood test of time better than anything else, if you give it basic read. its about getting pleasure, in socially acceptable ways without straighjt up ooga booga beating and killing.
his personality model is oddly in line with blue/red/black aswell.
black obviously is looking at things from raw see+want ooga booga point of view, but ,,red'' isnt any less dark when u look deep enaugh jfl(either sex version)
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - AlbanianLegend1994 - 15-02-2023
tiktok femboys are just working off another algorithm altogether, and they're of another generation
early-mid 2010s PSLcels are just disillusioned millennial autists who thought they were fighting the last war to preserve masculinity
and no what lookism became mid 2017+ is irrelevant and a joke
looksmax is just a parody website (but not to those who are posting there), just a bunch of late-to-the-party generation Z jeets who unironically believe the shyt they're reading and posting
but anyway all of this is irrelevant, what's relevant is that you're part of the humiliation matrix and women are going to Domme all of you soon.
"You allowed it to happen."
mirin lain avi btw
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - eldajaal1488 - 15-02-2023
(15-02-2023, 11:28 AM)AlbanianLegend1994 Wrote: tiktok femboys are just working off another algorithm altogether, and they're of another generation
early-mid 2010s PSLcels are just disillusioned millennial autists who thought they were fighting the last war to preserve masculinity
and no what lookism became mid 2017+ is irrelevant and a joke
looksmax is just a parody website (but not to those who are posting there), just a bunch of late-to-the-party generation Z jeets who unironically believe the shyt they're reading and posting
but anyway all of this is irrelevant, what's relevant is that you're part of the humiliation matrix and women are going to Domme all of you soon.
"You allowed it to happen."
mirin lain avi btw
they are already milking sub chads hard enaugh
and chads using them as fleshlights just as much, too but we ,,lesser man'' end up getting pent up rage chad left in them
in 2023 its chad fuxx alpha buxx isnt it(i mean u can be respected more or less in some field if skilled normie) i dont think its gonna get much worse from now on
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - Archimedes - 15-02-2023
(15-02-2023, 11:28 AM)AlbanianLegend1994 Wrote: tiktok femboys are just working off another algorithm altogether, and they're of another generation
early-mid 2010s PSLcels are just disillusioned millennial autists who thought they were fighting the last war to preserve masculinity
and no what lookism became mid 2017+ is irrelevant and a joke
looksmax is just a parody website (but not to those who are posting there), just a bunch of late-to-the-party generation Z jeets who unironically believe the shyt they're reading and posting
but anyway all of this is irrelevant, what's relevant is that you're part of the humiliation matrix and women are going to Domme all of you soon.
"You allowed it to happen."
mirin lain avi btw
LMAO. pretty legit post, tbh
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - prince of shitskins - 15-02-2023
people were taking the piss, of course the blackpill is bullshit
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - lonelyjak - 16-02-2023
(15-02-2023, 10:19 AM)Archimedes Wrote: all of that neo-Darwinian and EvoPysch nonsense only to be refuted by TikTok pretty/fem boys
lies. chico was a thing back on puahate, anyone talking about masc theory (like colez) was just trolling
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - Archimedes - 16-02-2023
(15-02-2023, 10:48 PM)Mark Felton Wrote: people were taking the piss, of course the blackpill is bullshit
(16-02-2023, 12:05 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:(15-02-2023, 10:19 AM)Archimedes Wrote: all of that neo-Darwinian and EvoPysch nonsense only to be refuted by TikTok pretty/fem boys
lies. chico was a thing back on puahate, anyone talking about masc theory (like colez) was just trolling
the blackpill isn't necessarily false, it was blown out of proportions to fit neo-Darwinian views, which doesn't coincide with reality, which is why there are stupid theories such as 'sub8 theory'
muh Women are selecting the best males out there and improving the genepool :soy: - no, they aren't
I agree some users were trolling. but the amount of information collected, esp. on hormones (muh high-T) do not point to this at all. I think .org, as in the 'best of best section' and its userbase is the perfect example of this, if not much worse
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - lonelyjak - 16-02-2023
(16-02-2023, 04:43 AM)Archimedes Wrote:what you wrote, in the way you wrote it was incorrect. you implied that old lookism was purely neo-darwinian and evopsych, but like you said above this was just a part of the userbase. in your OP you are implying that there was never a pretty/fem boy faction but there was a strong one, it was never purely neo-darwinian and evopsych types(15-02-2023, 10:48 PM)Mark Felton Wrote: people were taking the piss, of course the blackpill is bullshit(16-02-2023, 12:05 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:(15-02-2023, 10:19 AM)Archimedes Wrote: all of that neo-Darwinian and EvoPysch nonsense only to be refuted by TikTok pretty/fem boys
lies. chico was a thing back on puahate, anyone talking about masc theory (like colez) was just trolling
the blackpill isn't necessarily false, it was blown out of proportions to fit neo-Darwinian views, which doesn't coincide with reality, which is why there are stupid theories such as 'sub8 theory'
muh Women are selecting the best males out there and improving the genepool :soy: - no, they aren't
I agree some users were trolling. but the amount of information collected, esp. on hormones (muh high-T) do not point to this at all. I think .org, as in the 'best of best section' and its userbase is the perfect example of this, if not much worse
IOW im just getting you on technicalities here based on what you originally wrote. I think we're both ultimately on the same page though
RE: early lookism/psl was some sort of collective psychosis - Archimedes - 16-02-2023
(16-02-2023, 04:59 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:(16-02-2023, 04:43 AM)Archimedes Wrote:what you wrote, in the way you wrote it was incorrect. you implied that old lookism was purely neo-darwinian and evopsych, but like you said above this was just a part of the userbase. in your OP you are implying that there was never a pretty/fem boy faction but there was a strong one, it was never purely neo-darwinian and evopsych types(15-02-2023, 10:48 PM)Mark Felton Wrote: people were taking the piss, of course the blackpill is bullshit(16-02-2023, 12:05 AM)lonelyjak Wrote:(15-02-2023, 10:19 AM)Archimedes Wrote: all of that neo-Darwinian and EvoPysch nonsense only to be refuted by TikTok pretty/fem boys
lies. chico was a thing back on puahate, anyone talking about masc theory (like colez) was just trolling
the blackpill isn't necessarily false, it was blown out of proportions to fit neo-Darwinian views, which doesn't coincide with reality, which is why there are stupid theories such as 'sub8 theory'
muh Women are selecting the best males out there and improving the genepool :soy: - no, they aren't
I agree some users were trolling. but the amount of information collected, esp. on hormones (muh high-T) do not point to this at all. I think .org, as in the 'best of best section' and its userbase is the perfect example of this, if not much worse
IOW im just getting you on technicalities here based on what you originally wrote. I think we're both ultimately on the same page though
it's true there was the Chico 'faction' - I think it's because it was impossible to deny his attractiveness without sounding stupid